How Holiday Spending Trends Should Influence Your 2025 Debt Collection Strategy

It’s that time of year again—the season of giving, which has landed nearly half (47%) of consumers in debt thanks to holiday spending in the past. And the struggle continues to be real for consumers with 68% reporting that inflation is stretching their holiday budgets thin and 89% of consumers reporting they feel tempted to spend more than they should. For businesses, preparing for this almost inevitable holiday hangover should start now before the wave of past-due consumers comes rolling in (and rolling into late-stage delinquency further in the new year). Let’s look at how 2024’s holiday shopping and consumer spending trends should influence your 2025 debt collection strategy. Record-Breaking Holiday Consumer Spending Although there are five fewer shopping days in this year’s holiday calendar, that hasn’t slowed consumer spending: the average US consumer intends to spend $1,063 in nominal terms on holiday-related purchases this year, up 7.9% from $985 in 2023. Online sales for Black Friday alone reached a record $10.8 billion, with roughly $11.3 million spent per minute between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. for online shopping. And how are consumers paying for these shopping sprees? Credit cards are a top choice for 59%, with half of those saying they plan to use two or more credit cards, but higher interest rates are curtailing the use of credit cards compared to previous years for 44% of consumers. Buy Now, Play Later (BNPL) options are another popular method to purchase items outside their immediate budget with 67% of parents reporting they are likely to use pay later plans to finance their holiday shopping. Despite a determination to resist that temptation this year (67% of consumers said it's more important to save money than to give the best gift), the record numbers in spending and the trends towards credit cards and BNPLs foreshadows how businesses across industries need to brace for the post-holiday uptick in delinquencies. Why Holiday Spending Trends Affect Businesses Across Industries Before they even bust out the wrapping paper, 30% of consumers reported being prepared to break their budgets and go into debt due to holiday spending. While historically, credit card balances will rise significantly in the fourth quarter but then go down again in the first quarter of the new year, more consumers are carrying those heavier balances for longer—six in 10 consumers with credit card debt have had it for at least a year, up 10% from three years ago. And separate surveys found that about a third of consumers entered the shopping season with more than $5,000 in debt and 28% of shoppers who used credit cards have not paid off the presents they purchased last year. So even if your organization isn’t directly selling holiday gifts, consumers’ ability to stretch their budget to cover all their expenses can be impacted. How to Adapt Your Collection Strategy Based on Holiday Spending Trends Acknowledging this record spending and rolling debt, what are the key takeaways to help improve your collection strategy moving into 2025? Meet consumers where they are with digital-first communicationConsumers aren’t just shopping online—surveys find that 72% of respondents prefer to manage all their finances online or through a mobile app, so your outreach to collect on past-due payments should start there too. In fact, 98% of delinquent consumers serviced by TrueAccord resolve their debt without any human interaction thanks to our digital-first approach and self-serve portal. But take an overall omnichannel approach to consumer engagementWhile digital may be the growing consumer preference, don’t completely write-off traditional collection methods like phone calls and letters. There are many situations when digital may not be the ideal choice for outreach (such as lack of email contact, acquiring consent for digital communications where required, connecting with consumers unresponsive to digital outreach, among others), and not working with a collection partner that offers the full suite of communication channels means your business is missing out on recouping more. Be empathetic to consumers (all year round)More than half of consumers reported feeling stressed about their finances during the holiday season and, just like their gift-giving bills, these feelings can roll into the new year. But engaging with delinquent consumers through an empathic approach can encourage them to get back on track better than a generic template soliciting repayment. TrueAccord’s vast content library ensures consumers are getting the right message through the right channel at the right time thanks to our machine learning engine, HeartBeat, driven by data and insights from over 35 million consumer engagements accumulated over TrueAccord’s 12 years of service. Ready to scale-up your debt collection strategy for better engagement and liquidation rates? Schedule a consultation with TrueAccord experts today! Sources: NewsNation Experian Conference Board Forbes NPR PYMNTS LendingTree Marketplace Bankrate CreditKarma NerdWallet

Read More

TrueAccord’s Recent Litigation Win: Email Is Always Convenient

TrueAccord is at the forefront of defending litigation related to digital communications in debt collection and its recent victory in the Southern District of Florida is a resounding victory for digital channels in our industry. In Quinn-Davis v. TrueAccord, the court grappled with the concept of timing in order to figure out when an email is considered inconvenient under both the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Florida Debt Collection Practices Act (FCCPA). In this case, TrueAccord sent the email at 8:23pm, which is considered a convenient time by both statutes. The plaintiff’s email service provider delivered the email into plaintiff’s inbox at 10:14pm, and the consumer opened the email the following day at 11:44am. The court found no violation of the FDCPA or the FCCPA and granted summary judgment in TrueAccord’s favor. The FDCPA and FCCPA Prohibitions on Inconvenient Time To reach its decision, the Court evaluated the inconvenient time provisions of the two statutes. First, the Court analyzed the FDCPA’s provision, breaking it down into three principles: The basic prohibition: A debt collector may not “communicate with a consumer” in connection with any debt collection at (i) any unusual time or place, or (ii) a time or place known or which should be known to be inconvenient to the consumer.  The safe harbor: In the absence of the debt collector’s knowledge of circumstances to the contrary, a debt collector shall assume that communicating with a consumer between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. (at the consumer’s location) is convenient (and therefore does not trigger liability).  The prior consent exemption: If the “prior consent of the consumer” is given “directly to the debt collector,” then the debt collector can engage in the activity described in #1 above, regardless of the debt collector’s knowledge or assumptions of the consumer’s communication preferences.  --See 15 U.S.C. § 1692c(a)(1). The Court explained that the FCCPA uses similar language to the FDCPA, quoting the statute: In collecting consumer debts no person shall: … Communicate with the debtor between the hours of 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. in the debtor’s time zone without the prior consent of the debtor.” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 559.72(17) (emphasis added). The Court noted that, since this case turned on the interpretation of “communicate with,” it did not have to “parse” the “prior consent” exception language. Applying the facts to these two statutes, the court found no violation of law under either—the first published decision relating to email and inconvenient times. The Court’s Decision: Email, By Its Silent Nature, Is Never Inconvenient Like Noisy Calls The decision starts with an eye-catching quote: “If a tree falls in the forest and no one else is around to hear it, does it make a sound?” This case poses a modern variation of that old chestnut, with a tip-of-the-cap to our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. and Tallahassee… The court cites its authority under the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision Loper-Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo to reject the CFPB’s interpretation of when an email is considered inconvenient in Regulation F, discussed further below. In its own interpretation, the court found that the consumer opened and read the email at 11:44am, which is a presumably convenient time under both statutes. The court explicitly stated that it did not take into consideration facts about whether the timing of the email was inconvenient because no evidence was presented on it. However, the court said: So, what is a prohibited e-mail communication under the FDCPA? When precisely does liability attach? If a debt collector sends an e-mail after 9:00 p.m. and the consumer opens and reads it at 9:00 a.m. the following day, does that violate the FDCPA? What if the debt collector sends an e-mail before 9:00 p.m. but the consumer reads it at midnight? Liable? Clearly, the FDCPA’s safe harbor was aimed at protecting consumers from after-hours noisy telephone rings—not e-mails sitting in one’s e-mail box (silently) overnight. (Emphasis added.) By this language, the Court suggests that even an email sent after 9:00pm may not be a violation of the inconvenient time prohibition. In this case, the plaintiff opened the email over 13 hours after it was delivered into their inbox, indicating the consumer waited to read it until it was convenient for them. Ultimately, an email is convenient whenever the consumer opens it because that is when they chose to do so. TrueAccord knows this to be true based on our email communications with millions of consumers. Our own engagement data shows that 25% of consumers engage with emails after 9:00 pm and before 8:00 am. The timing between when an email is sent, delivered, and opened, similar to physical letters, may vary widely from consumer to consumer based on their own choices. The Court Refused to Follow the CFPB’s Interpretation of the FDCPA It is important to recognize that in reaching this decision, the Court declined to follow the CFPB’s guidance. In Regulation F, the CFPB spelled out its official interpretation that the time an email is sent, not delivered, is used to determine whether the communication was sent during an inconvenient time. See 12 C.F.R. Part 1006.6(b)(1)(i)(1). Citing both the Supreme Court Loper decision (and the original, landmark Supreme Court decision in Marbury), the Court stated: While the CFPB interpretation may have some appeal (on policy grounds), I am neither bound by it nor required to defer to it. See generally Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 144 S. Ct. 2244 (2024) (overruling Chevron USA, Inc. v. Nat’l Res. Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984)). “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” Loper, 144 S.Ct. at 2257 (citing Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803)). Based on the plain language of the FDCPA, the Court independently concluded that a debt collector must “actually transmit or transfer information to another person in order to communicate with a consumer.” Notably, in reaching this conclusion, the Court pointed out what all of us already know because we use email every day, stating: You don’t need to be a Ph.D. in computer science to take judicial notice of the basic nature of e-mail communication. Hundreds of millions of Americans use e-mail all the time. This decision does not require debt collectors who set up their email policies and practices based on the CFPB’s Regulation F guidance to change their practices. As the Court noted, sending proactive, debt collection emails during the presumptively convenient hours of 8:00am to 9:00pm may be “more protective of consumers in many cases.” Just like sending physical letters, the time when a consumer chooses to read the email is outside of a debt collector's control and fully within the control of the consumer. If the consumer chooses to read it late at night or 2 days later at noon, that is the consumer’s choice and their preferred time to read that message. Therefore, it remains a best practice for compliance with the plain language of the FDCPA and similar state laws like the FCCPA, to send proactive, debt collection emails during presumptively convenient times. -- Note: This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. Readers should consult their own counsel for advice regarding their specific situation.

Read More

Client Success Story: TrueAccord Delivers Industry-Leading Engagement, Repayment for Scale-Up BNPL

With its growing popularity, one Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) faced challenges with the complexity of managing late-stage collection—a hurdle many start-ups face since the majority of a scaling company’s resources are dedicated to bottom-line business goals rather than debt collection. So as the BNPL continued to expand, accounts overdue by 90 days or more accumulated without a scalable strategy for resolution, making the BNPL vulnerable to revenue loss. But partnering with the experts at TrueAccord would set a plan in place with impressive liquidation and engagement results. As their first debt collection provider, the BNPL leveraged TrueAccord’s decade-plus of experience to develop a comprehensive debt recovery strategy from the ground up. TrueAccord's digital-first approach to collections was particularly appealing to the BNPL, aligning with their tech-forward, consumer-centric philosophy, and delivered on several key benefits: Cost Savings Automation and Scalability Enhanced Consumer Experience Compliance and Expertise Through this partnership and late-stage debt collection strategy, delinquent accounts were managed thoroughly and efficiently—and their engagement rates were the first in a domino effect of improved results: 45% Email Open Rate compared to industry average of 22.5% 14% Email Click Rate compared to industry average 2.3% Discover the impressive liquidation rates and detailed benefits TrueAccord provides in the full in-depth case study here»» Ready to scale-up your debt collection strategy for better engagement and liquidation rates? Schedule a consultation with TrueAccord experts today! Industry average statistic sources: Hubspot Campaign Monitor

Read More

Q3 Industry Insights: Inflation and Interest Rates Drop, Christmas Comes Early

The big inflation situation plaguing the U.S. for the past three years seems to be coming to an end, and it could be that American consumers are partially to thank. Tired of paying higher prices, consumers increasingly turned to cheaper alternatives, bargain hunted or simply avoided items they found too expensive, pressuring retailers to accommodate them or lose their business. That’s not to say Americans have stopped spending altogether—the economy continues to expand and people continue to struggle against inflated prices for necessities across the board, often still turning to credit cards to make ends meet. With consumers setting the demand amidst elevated prices and inflation declining slowly, retailers have gotten an even earlier jump on holiday promotions this year in the hopes of boosting sales in a price-wary environment. Spreading holiday expenses out over a longer period of time may ease the financial burden slightly, but the cumulative dollars spent will still weigh heavily on consumer finances for Q4 and rolling into 2025. The National Retail Federation is forecasting that winter holiday spending is expected to grow between 2.5% and 3.5% over last year, with a total reaching between $979.5 billion and $989 billion. We are starting to feel an economic shift, but what does this all mean and what’s the outlook for the end of the year? Read on for our take on what’s impacting consumer finances, how consumers are reacting and what else you should be considering as it relates to debt collection today. What’s Impacting Consumers? While not the straight line decline economists would like to see, the September results show that inflation is slowly and steadily easing back to the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. After several months of decreasing inflation and amid slowing job gains, the Fed in September announced the first in a series of interest rate cuts, slashing the federal funds rate by 1/2 percentage point to 4.75-5%. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell indicated that more interest rate cuts are in the plans but they would come at a slower pace, likely in quarter-point increments, intended to support a still-healthy economy and a soft landing.  The rate cut plans have been made possible by consistently declining inflation. The Consumer Price Index rose just 2.4% in September from last year, down from 2.5% in August, showing the smallest annual rise since February 2021. Core prices, which exclude the more volatile food and energy costs, remained elevated in September, due in part to rising costs for medical care, clothing, auto insurance and airline fares. But apartment rental prices grew more slowly last month, a sign that housing inflation is finally cooling and foreshadowing a long-awaited development that would provide relief to many consumers. The September jobs report supported the economic optimism by adding a whopping 254,000 jobs, far exceeding economists’ expectations of 140,000. The unemployment rate lowered to 4.1%, below projections of remaining steady at 4.2%. The government has also reported that the economy expanded at a solid 3% annual rate Q2, with growth expected to continue at a similar pace in Q3. This combination of downward trending interest rates and unemployment plus an expanding economy is great news for consumers and businesses alike, and can’t come soon enough for many financially strained Americans. Coming out of Q2, total household debt rose by $109 billion to reach $17.80 trillion, according to the latest Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit. This increase showed up across debt types: mortgage balances were up $77 billion to reach $12.52 trillion, auto loans increased by $10 billion to reach $1.63 trillion and credit card balances increased by $27 billion to reach $1.14 trillion.  Unsurprisingly, delinquency and charge-off rates ticked up as consumers struggled against still relatively high prices and interest rates. In mid-September, shares of consumer-lending companies slid after executives raised warnings about lower-income borrowers who are struggling to make payments. Delinquency transition rates for credit cards, auto loans and mortgages all increased slightly, with a steeper increase in flow to serious delinquency for credit cards, up more than 2% over last year from 5.08% to 7.18%. This kind of delinquency can be especially difficult for consumers to recover from given the record-high credit card rates many are stuck with. While still low by historical standards, the mortgage delinquency rate was up 3 basis points in Q2 from the first quarter of 2024 and up 60 basis points from one year ago. The delinquency rate for mortgage loans increased to a seasonally adjusted rate of 3.97% at the end of Q2, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) National Delinquency Survey, an increase that corresponded with a rise in unemployment and showed up across all product types. For those with student loans, September marked the end of the ‘on-ramp’ to resuming payments, which was the set period of time that allowed financially vulnerable borrowers who missed payments during the first 12 months not to be considered delinquent, reported to credit bureaus, placed in default, or referred to debt collection agencies. However, the grace period is over and anyone who doesn’t resume making student loan payments in October risks a hit to their credit score—we will see these delinquencies reported in Q4. Financial Protection for Consumers Across the Board The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) continued with a high level of activity through the summer. Along with taking action against more than a handful of financial services companies in the name of consumer protection, the agency made headway on myriad other issues. To kick off Q3, the CFPB published Supervisory Highlights sharing key findings from recent examinations of auto and student loan servicing companies, debt collectors and other financial services providers that found loan servicing failures, illegal debt collection practices and issues with medical payment products. The report also highlighted consumer complaints about medical payment products and identified concerns with providers preventing access to deposit and prepaid account funds. Then, the CFPB and five other agencies issued a final rule on automated valuation models. The agencies, including the OCC, FRB, FDIC, NCUA, and FHA designed the rule to help ensure credibility and integrity of models used in valuations for certain housing mortgages. The rule requires adoption of compliance management systems to ensure a high level of confidence in estimates, protect against data manipulation, avoid conflicts of interest, randomly test and review the processes and comply with nondiscrimination laws. Next, the CFPB joined several other federal financial regulatory agencies to propose a rule to establish data standards to promote "interoperability" of financial regulatory data across the agencies. The proposal would establish data standards for identifiers of legal entities and other common identifiers. Also in August, the CFPB responded to the U.S. Treasury's request for information on the use of artificial intelligence in the financial services sector. The CFPB emphasized that regulators have a legal mandate to ensure that existing rules are enforced for all technologies, including new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and its subtypes. It’s clear that the CFPB has an interest in how those technologies are used and what the consumer impact may be. In September, the bureau issued its annual report on debt collection, which highlighted aggressive and illegal practices in the collection of medical debt and rental debt. The report focused on improperly inflated rental debt amounts and on debt collectors’ attempts to collect medical bills already satisfied by financial assistance programs, also noting that many medical bills from low-income consumers do not get addressed by financial assistance in the first place. Finally, the CFPB published guidance to help federal and state consumer protection enforcers stop banks from charging overdraft fees without having proof they obtained customers’ consent. Under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, banks cannot charge overdraft fees on ATM and one-time debit card transactions unless consumers have affirmatively opted in. Disjointed Consumer Sentiment Weighs Heavy A September Consumer Survey of Expectations found that Americans anticipated higher inflation over the longer run as their expectations of credit turbulence rose to the highest level since April 2020, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. While perceptions and expectations for credit access improved, the expected credit delinquency rates rose again and hit the highest level in more than four years. According to the survey, the average expected probability of missing a debt payment over the next three months rose for a fourth straight month to 14.2%, up from 13.6% in August, suggesting some Americans are concerned with their ability to manage their borrowing.  Despite inflation easing, consumers perceive that the costs of everyday items are on the rise. According to the latest report from PYMNTS Intelligence, which tracks the percent of consumers living paycheck-to-paycheck, 70% of all consumers surveyed said their income has not kept up with inflation. This feeling is stronger for paycheck-to-paycheck consumers, with 77% of those struggling to pay bills on time reporting that their income hasn’t kept up with rising costs. Even for those not living paycheck to paycheck, 61% shared this concerning sentiment. As a result, consumers are buying cheaper or lesser quality alternatives, if they’re buying at all. Prior to the September interest rate cuts, the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index showed consumer confidence plunging to the most pessimistic economic outlook since 2021, based on a weaker job market and a high cost of living. Americans reported being anxious ahead of the upcoming election and assessments of current and future business conditions and labor market conditions turned negative. However, following the Fed’s rate cut announcement, another report from the University of Michigan’s sentiment index showed a rise in late September, reaching a five-month high on more optimism about the economy. Consumer expectations for price increases dropped simultaneously with more expectations for declining borrowing costs in the coming year. Consumer sentiments on their finances directly impact their spending and payment behaviors, so understanding where they stand can inform a better debt collection approach.  What Does This Mean for Debt Collection? You’ve heard of Christmas in July, but Christmas in September? With the holiday shopping season starting earlier and in the midst of a high-stakes election, consumers will continue to prioritize expenses and spending based on their current financial outlook, which hasn’t yet caught up with the optimism showing up in the overall economy. The unknowns of what happens post-election along with the delayed impact of lower interest rates and inflation on spending leave the outcome for consumer finances uncertain. Delinquencies continue to persist and it may be some time before the benefits of a friendlier economy show up in consumers’ bank accounts. For companies looking to recover delinquent funds now, understanding how, when and in what way to engage consumers can increase recovery success. For lenders and collectors, here are some things to consider for 2025 planning: • Self-serve = more repayment. For both businesses and consumers, reducing the need to engage directly with human agents to make payments or access account information saves time and resources. Solutions like self-serve portals represent a shift towards greater consumer control over their financial health, providing an efficient way for individuals to address and manage their finances—and debts specifically—on their own terms. • Omnichannel or bust. If your business relies solely on one channel for customer communications, it’s time to evolve. Utilizing a combination of calling, emailing, text messaging and even self-serve online portals is the preferred experience for 9 out of 10 customers. And it’s not just beneficial for consumers–the omnichannel approach has been shown to increase payment arrangements by as much as 40%! • Keep an eye on compliance (or make sure your debt collector does). The regulatory landscape will continue to change, especially post-election. Your risk and success hinges on how well you can keep up with the changes, so having someone responsible for monitoring and tweaking your strategy is critical. SOURCES: NRF - Holiday Spending AP News - Inflation  AP News - Rate Cuts  USA Today - Sept. Jobs Report  NY Fed - Household Debt  AP News - Economic Growth  MBA - Mortgage Delinquencies  WSJ - Consumer Lending Companies Concerned  USA Today - Student Loans  CFPB - Loan Servicing and Medical Debt  CFPB - Automated Valuation Models  CFPB - Standardizing Data  CFPB - AI in Financial Services  CFPB - Annual Report  CFPB - Overdraft Fees  Reuters - Consumer Inflation Expectations  PYMNTS - Paycheck to Paycheck  Conference Board - Consumer Confidence Bloomberg / University of Michigan - Consumer Sentiment  FICO - Omnichannel

Read More

The TrueAccord Difference for a Better Self-Serve Consumer Experience

While many financial service institutions can offer basic payment portals, these are often limited when it comes to collecting on delinquent accounts. TrueAccord delivers a robust difference. Self-serve options should be a key part of any collections operation. In fact, research from McKinsey found that consumers who digitally self-serve resolve their debts at higher rates, are significantly more likely to pay in full, and report higher levels of customer satisfaction than consumers who pay via a collection call. At TrueAccord, we provide more than a basic payment portal—the power of our self-serve solutions gives your business and your customers better control over the repayment process. TrueAccord’s self-serve portal delivers less friction for delinquent consumers ready to manage their debt, while your organization determines the extent of account details to display, what flexible payment options you’d like to provide, and more. Let’s look at how TrueAccord provides a superior consumer experience and better bottom-line results for your business through our self-serve portal and solutions. Why Offer Self-Serve Options on Top of Traditional Collection Methods? Two of the most prominent use cases for deploying self-serve channels are consumer preference and compliance—and both are success stories for TrueAccord. The numbers cannot be ignored: 98% of delinquent consumers serviced by TrueAccord resolve their debt without any human interaction, which in turn saves time, resources, and headcount. When asked why they pay bills online, three in 10 consumer survey respondents said they like the flexibility to pay whenever and wherever they want—a convenience traditional call-and-collect methods cannot extend to consumers due to FDCPA’s “Inconvenient Times” rule under Regulation F. The “Inconvenient Times” rule prohibits calls to consumers before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. in the consumer’s local time zone, because calls made during those times are presumed inconvenient. But self-serve options put the power in the consumer’s hand 24/7. At TrueAccord, 29% of online payments are made outside of traditional FDCPA hours. Self-Serve Success with Advanced Machine Learning and Omnichannel Engagement Does your digital debt collection outreach strategy extend beyond email or SMS? A true omnichannel approach goes further to interweave self-serve options—and TrueAccord delivers. Whether via email, text message, or even physical letters, there are several ways TrueAccord reaches consumers in debt collection and empower them to take charge of their repayment journey through the self-serve portal. And even if the first engagement attempt is unsuccessful, HeartBeat—TrueAccord’s patented machine learning decision-engine—will adjust communication cadence, content, and even channel dynamically. Studies show that 54% of consumers expect their financial provider to leverage the data they have about them to personalize their experience, so HeartBeat looks at individual account characteristics—like debt type, creditor, balance size, age of debt, etc.—and selects a message (written by experienced debt collection content creators) based on previous interactions with consumers that have similar characteristics. Thanks to our 35 million consumer interactions collected, HeartBeat drives both the optimal engagement and repayment rates while working within both our client’s guidelines and regulatory requirements. Want to take an even deeper dive into the consumer experience-side of TrueAccord’s self-serve portal? Download our free eBook for more details and a visual walkthrough of the consumer experience when using our portal here»» What Do TrueAccord Consumers Have to Say? Don’t take our word for it—read testimonials and feedback from real consumers who have resolved their delinquent accounts through TrueAccord’s self-serve portal: “This was a great experience for me. The portal was so easy to operate quickly and easily. Thank you.” “Easiest to work with, never had to speak with a representative, was able to fully manage and pay off the account via their online portal.” “I appreciated the zero harassment, easy portal interface. I have been stressed about this for a while, hardship came up, but you made it easy and less stressful to take care of.” “Thank you for being patient and for having a portal that makes it easy to make the payment without filling out a bunch of stuff and having to make an account.” “I appreciate you notifying me via email and having a great online payment portal. It made the process really easy.” Ready to Get Started? Empower consumers with a self-serve experience—and collect faster from happier people. Schedule a consultation and get set for a live demo of the TrueAccord self-serve portal»» Sources: McKinsey

Read More

Consumers Prefer Self-Serve Options for Debt Repayment—and Businesses Cannot Afford to Ignore Consumer Preferences

Self-service portals are an empowering way to get consumers back on track. In fact, research from McKinsey found that consumers who digitally self-serve resolve their debts at higher rates and are significantly more likely to pay in full. Just take into consideration that surveys have found that four in 10 have used an online portal supplied by a financial institution for bill pay, while only a quarter have paid by phone, mailing a check, or in person. But along with helping your bottom line, consumers just prefer these kinds of self-serve methods for payments. Let’s dive even deeper into consumer behavior and preferences when it comes to handling payments and account management via self-service—and why organizations cannot ignore the numbers. Self-Serve Preferences by the Numbers The numbers don’t lie—more consumers want and use self-serve online portals for bill pay: 60% of consumers prefer self-service options 54% of surveyed consumers have used an online portal supplied by a biller 47% prefer self-serve portals because of the convenience and flexibility And businesses cannot afford to ignore these preferences: 81% of customers want more self-serve options 14% of bill-payers who prioritize at least one bill over others identified the ease of making payments as a key factor in that decision-making process According to one study performed by McKinsey, a bank saw a 15% increase of cured accounts after implementing a self-service option 70% of customers expect a company’s website to include a self-service application Despite this data, a 2023 Transunion report shows that 64% of collections agencies don’t have self-serve capabilities, and simply increasing customer calling won’t improve contact and recovery rates. But don’t worry—TrueAccord’s self-serve portal has proven to be a win for both businesses and their customers, with 98% of delinquent consumers serviced by TrueAccord resolving their debt without any human interaction. TrueAccord’s Machine Learning Engine Powers a Better, Compliant Self-Serve Experience At TrueAccord, we know that every consumer’s delinquency situation is unique and so are their repayment and engagement preferences. So from our initial outreach, we tailor our consumer communications using our patented machine learning engine, HeartBeat, to determine the right message, right channel, and right time to engage. HeartBeat uses a machine learning model that looks at account properties and chooses a communication (written by experienced debt collection content creators) based on previous interactions with consumers that have similar characteristics. This is important since studies show that 53% of consumers expect their financial provider to leverage the data they have about them to personalize their experience. From messaging that resonates to flexible payment options within our self-serve portal, TrueAccord uses advanced machine learning to drive the optimal engagement and repayment rates while working within both our client’s guidelines and regulatory requirements. Our self-serve portal meets collections compliance rules while also meeting a consumer preference at the same time. When asked why they pay bills online, three in 10 survey respondents said they like the flexibility to pay whenever and wherever they want—a convenience traditional call-and-collect methods cannot extend to consumers due to FDCPA’s “Inconvenient Times” rule under Regulation F. The “Inconvenient Times” rule prohibits calls to consumers before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. in the consumer’s local time zone, because calls made during those times are presumed inconvenient. But self-serve options put the power in the consumer’s hand 24/7. At TrueAccord, 29% of online payments are made outside of traditional FDCPA hours. By following all compliance regulations and your business’s guidelines, our consumer outreach aims to drive the most engagement and commitment to repayment through the self-serve portal. What Consumers Have to Say About TrueAccord’s Self-Serve Portal We’ve looked at a lot of statistics supporting consumers’ preference for self-serve options, but let’s hear from real consumers that have used TrueAccord’s portal: “This was a great experience for me. The portal was so easy to operate quickly and easily. Thank you.” “Easiest to work with, never had to speak with a representative, was able to fully manage and pay off the account via their online portal.” “I appreciated the zero harassment, easy portal interface. I have been stressed about this for a while, hardship came up, but you made it easy and less stressful to take care of.” “Thank you for being patient and for having a portal that makes it easy to make the payment without filling out a bunch of stuff and having to make an account.” “I appreciate you notifying me via email and having a great online payment portal. It made the process really easy.” And put quite simply, our consumers “love this online payment portal.” Want to take a peek at TrueAccord’s Self-Serve Portal? Download our free eBook for more details and a visual walkthrough of the consumer experience when using our portal here»» Ready to see a demo in action and learn more about all of TrueAccord’s omnichannel, machine-learning powered collections? Schedule a consultation today»» Sources: McKinsey The Financial Brand Forbes 2022 Digital-First Customer Experience Report PYMNTS The Self Service Economy MX Technologies Surveys

Read More

The Low Friction Way For Consumers to Repay: Self-Serve Options for Debt Collection

After months of inflation woes, both economists and consumers are starting to see a glimpse of optimism.In the first interest rate cut since the early days of the Covid pandemic, the Federal Reserve announced in September 2024 that it is slicing half a percentage point off benchmark rates. So it’s not surprising that Americans are getting more confident that inflation is cooling off, but optimism for the U.S. economy doesn’t extend to personal finances—consumer expectations for going delinquent on their debt in the next three months hit their highest level since the start of the pandemic. And the share of severely delinquent credit card debt rose to 10.7% during the first quarter of 2024, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, compared to just 8.2% of credit card debt more than 90 days overdue in 2023. But better customer engagement strategies can help businesses recover more debt—and self-serve portals are an empowering way to get consumers back on track. What is a “self-serve portal” in financial services and collections? In the financial services sector, a self-service or self-serve portal is a secure online platform or application designed to empower consumers to make payments and, ideally, allow them to manage their accounts and payment terms independently (although not all portals offer the same functionality). Self-serve portals aim to grant customers the ability to manage their finances without the help of a service representative. For both businesses and consumers, reducing the need to engage directly with human agents to make payments or access account information saves time and resources. Overall, these self-service solutions represent a shift towards greater consumer control over their financial health, providing an efficient way for individuals to address and manage their finances—and debts specifically—on their own terms. What are the benefits of offering self-service options in debt collection? Similar to any other financial institution or ecommerce business, self-service portals in collections intend to foster a sense of autonomy for the delinquent consumer to manage their debt without the pressure or inconvenience of interacting with a call center agent. Besides creating a more preferred experience for the consumer, organizations needing to recoup funds will reap several benefits by providing self-serve options as well: Cost Savings:In today’s digital world, call centers or full-time employees (FTEs) dedicated to late-stage collections have proven to be an expensive and less effective path for debt recovery. Employees often spend a significant amount of time arranging repayment plans, providing account details, and processing payments—and that’s if the consumer actually answers the collector’s call. So when it comes to cost savings, just consider this: the average cost of a contact center call is $8.01, which is 80x more expensive than a self-service interaction. Scalability:Unlike human agents who can physically only make a certain number of calls per day and are legally only allowed to call consumers during convenient hours (as defined by Regulation F), self-serve portals are available to consumers 24/7. These platforms can handle any number of collection cases at any time of day without compromising user experience, making it easy to scale your capacity as delinquency volumes rise—no additional headcount required. Compliance:Non-compliance can be costly in the collection landscape heavily regulated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Whether partnering with a third party or training FTEs, the risk of human error resulting in compliance violations is easily mitigated with digital self-serve solutions that have compliance controls built in—but this does require due diligence on the business or lenders’ part to ask and verify that the solution is keeping up with all necessary regulation and industry security standards. Frictionless Consumer Experience:Surveys have found that consumers both prefer and want more self-serve options to repay, but that is just the tip of the iceberg of what consumer preferences can mean for your recovery and resolution rates. Research from McKinsey found consumers who digitally self-serve (versus consumers who pay via a collection call): Resolve their debts at higher rates  Significantly more likely to pay in full  Report higher levels of customer satisfaction Proven Success with TrueAccord’s Self-Serve Portal While many financial service institutions already offer basic payment portals, these are often limited when it comes to collecting on delinquent accounts. And traditional call centers typically cannot provide self-serve options, even if they can offer other digital options like email or SMS for consumer outreach. But TrueAccord provides more than a simple payment portal—the power of our self-serve solutions gives your business and your consumers better control over the repayment process for better results. TrueAccord delivers less friction and frustration for delinquent consumers ready to manage their debt, while your organization determines the extent of account details to display, what flexible payment options you’d like to provide, and more. In fact, 98% of delinquent consumers serviced by TrueAccord resolve their debt without any human interaction, with 29% of online payments made outside of traditional FDCPA hours—saving time, resources, and headcount while meeting consumer preferences compliantly under Reg F’s inconvenient time rule and beyond. Want to take a peek at TrueAccord’s Self-Serve Portal? Download our free eBook for more details and a visual walkthrough of the consumer experience when using our portal here»» Ready to see a demo in action and learn more about all of TrueAccord’s omnichannel, machine-learning powered collections? Schedule a consultation today»» Sources: CNBC Inc. PBS Gartner 2022 DIGITAL-FIRST CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE REPORT McKinsey

Read More

Client Success Story: Online Lender Achieves 30% Better Late-Stage Collection Result Through Empathetic, Omnichannel Approach

TrueAccord proved more effective for late-stage collections and better aligned with online lender’s empathetic approach to financial services. For one online lender, providing online personal loans to underserved consumers was not only a core service for their business but also a key part of their company mission. This tech-enabled financial platform offers safe, simple, and affordable credit access to consumers with varied financial histories who lack traditional options, emphasizing empathy and support in their customer interactions. Historically, the online lender relied on legal avenues for debt collection, a tactic not always in line with the empathetic approach the company championed in their other services. While they wanted to improve their liquidation rates, the lender recognized they needed more of a traditional agency along with their existing legal strategy—but the challenge was to find a collection agency that could balance effectiveness with a consumer-centric approach that could mirror the lender’s empathetic mission throughout the borrower lifecycle. Simply adding a call center-based agency would be counter-intuitive for an online lender with digital and omnichannel collection partners available to provide a smoother customer experience. During their due diligence looking at potential debt recovery partners that have integrated digital into the consumer communication mix, a new question arose: how would they decide between the newer, digital-focused agencies that have entered the collections space? Enter the champion-challenger evaluation method pitting TrueAccord against another digital collections provider. Over a six-month period, the online lender evenly split their available late-stage collections market share 50/50 between TrueAccord and the competitor agency. Although the challenger collection agency provided somewhat similar services for consumer engagement by including some digital outreach along with traditional outbound dialing and letters, TrueAccord’s robust omnichannel approach was backed by over a decade of experience using digital-first communication methods. And the results would prove that TrueAccord was not only superior in effectively collecting from late-stage accounts, but also in overall mission alignment with the lender’s efforts towards a more empathetic approach to financial services. Even before the online lender began to explore options for collecting on late-stage debts, both the lender and TrueAccord shared a focus on helping consumers; and by partnering together, they were able to provide that consumer-centric approach to financial services throughout the entire borrower lifecycle. TrueAccord consistently outperformed the challenger to the point where it became clear that the lender was actually losing money by continuing to give 50% of their available market share to the competitor. In fact, over time, TrueAccord’s liquidation rates were 30% higher than that of its competitor. Together, TrueAccord not only enhanced and improved the lender’s debt recovery efforts but also reinforced their company values to deliver empathy even after delinquency—no small feat in the traditional debt collection industry. Discover the TrueAccord difference that helps clients achieve better liquidation rates and happier consumers in the full, in-depth case study available for download here»» Are you ready to evaluate your legacy collections servicer against TrueAccord’s proven digital-first, omnichannel approach? Schedule a consultation today!

Read More

Understanding the Consumer Spending Split and How to Recover More Across the Divide

It’s becoming a familiar headline: US household debt keeps climbing and delinquency rates keep rising. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit, household debt rose to $17.69 trillion in the first quarter of 2024. The report showed 6.9% of credit card debt transitioned to serious delinquency in the first quarter, with approximately 4.8% of consumers holding some debt in third-party collections. Overall, 77% of American households have at least some type of debt, but that debt isn't evenly distributed—and consumer spending habits can vary just as much depending on income level. Understanding the split in consumer spending and its impact on household debt—and in turn, collections—is critical for today’s debt recovery strategies. While across the board debt may be climbing and delinquencies rising, your consumer engagement approach and communications to secure repayment cannot be one-size-fits-all for all consumers. What is the Consumer Spending Divide? Spending divide. Split-spending patterns. A tale of two consumers. Two-speed economy…all of these naming conventions describe the widening gap between income levels, spending habits, and inevitably types of debt accumulated. While the last few years showed consistent spending rates across all income groups as a result of pandemic-era benefits, savings surplus, and wage growth, this is no longer the case. More recent data has revealed that as pandemic savings declined at the same time as both inflation and interest rates increased, lower-income households are becoming more financially strained while higher-income households are mostly unaffected. Today, we see more affluent consumers continue to spend at consistent rates, while more middle- and lower-income consumers' personal disposable income has not kept pace with rising prices and as a result, these households have become more indebted. Even when there is a spending uptick in the lower-income sector, as seen in April 2024, what these consumers are spending on and how they are paying for it is still quite different from their higher-income counterparts. These spending patterns show that lower-earning consumers are putting more everyday bills on credit cards—and in turn, credit card delinquencies and charge-offs for these consumers are returning to their pre-pandemic levels faster than other groups. Not surprisingly, the ripple effect of this deepening income-level divide impacts consumer sentiment along with spending. While surveys from June 2023 had shown similar levels of consumer sentiment between bottom-third earners and top-level earners, today higher-income households report a much more positive outlook compared to many lower earners who report feeling less confident in their own household finances. And yet, 40% of consumers (across the divide) have expressed an intent to splurge over the summer months—so what different variations of delinquencies can we expect between the split of spenders? And how can businesses differentiate their approach to collections to more effectively recover debt faster? How Does the Divide Impact Delinquencies? Let’s start with the first question: what different types of debt are each income sector accumulating today? Higher-income consumers: non-essentials and luxuries like travel, vacations, hotels, resorts, amusement parksSurveys show that higher-income households are more optimistic about their ability to take trips and spend on luxuries like full-service hotels and resorts—in fact, 74% of respondents with annual household incomes of $100,000 or more plan to take a summer vacation and, across income levels, 36% anticipate taking on debt to pay for it. We can even put a microscope to this ‘YOLO’ attitude towards spending on experiences by looking at Disney amusement parks. Surveys find: 45% of parents take on debt for Disney vacations $1,983 is the average amount of debt for those parents 75% report that their Disney trip did or would take six months or less to pay off Total respondents who went into debt during a Disney trip also increased 33% from a 2022 survey Lower-income consumers: essentials like rent, utilities, everyday necessitiesConversely, the delinquencies for lower-income households start at home: 25% of low-income renters (defined by a Community Solutions survey as those with an annual income of less than $50,000) are 4-7 months behind on rent. And the New York Fed reported 57% of households are rent burdened in low-income areas, where they pay more than 30% of their monthly income on rent. Even with wage gains over the last several years, 40% of consumers say they earn insufficient incomes and struggle to keep up with inflation and interest rates. And with approximately 75% of low-income households reporting living paycheck-to-paycheck, to bridge the gap there is an increasing reliance on credit cards to cover bills, so it is not surprising these consumers are falling behind on their credit card payments. The spending divide leads to a divide on what consumers are going into delinquency for—so what’s the best way to engage and secure repayment when consumers’ financial situations and outlooks are so split? How Can You Recover More Across Each Side of the Divide? Regardless of where your customers fall in the divide, businesses must face facts: overall delinquent balances increased by 3.46% in June 2024 and then again in July by 0.51%. This paired with the fact that 1.11% of consumer accounts rolled into higher stages of delinquency marks an uptick in the roll rate in June compared to the improvement (decreases) seen in the past several months. But with delinquency rates continuing to rise, it’s important to tailor your recovery approach to each consumer you seek to collect from with customized, omnichannel engagement. A successful collections strategy goes beyond the simplified “tale of two consumers” and actually engages with individuals uniquely with the right message delivered through the right channel at the right time for them. While getting payment reminders is beneficial for consumers across the divide, hovering between roughly 40% to 50% from the under $50,000 cohort all the way to the $100,000 and above bracket, the preference for how these reminders are sent varies across all consumers: 36% prefer text 32% prefer email 4% prefer a paper letter mailed 1% prefer receiving a phone call But for most businesses, executing an advanced outreach strategy can be a major undertaking, especially for those used to relying on traditional call-and-collect methods. Partnering with TrueAccord can alleviate the potential strain on resources and simultaneously help you collect more faster. TrueAccord not only engages your delinquent customers through this proven effective omnichannel approach, but also leverages our patented machine learning engine, HeartBeat, to effectively ​​reach out to every account placed with a goal of getting them to repay on their own terms when they are ready. HeartBeat dynamically optimizes the next best touchpoint for every consumer in real-time, including the content, timing, and channel for each customer. No matter where your customers fall in the consumer spending divide, TrueAccord has the right message, right channel, and right timing to recover more across the board. Ready to get started? Schedule a consultation today»» Sources: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Q1 2024 Quarterly Report Bloomberg Ramsey Axios Federal Reserve Board Publication May 2024 New York Times McKinsey Bankrate USA Today Community Solutions New York Fed PYMNTS Ascend Market Insights Dashboard Report: Consumer Trends Driving the Future of Loan Payments

Read More

Q2 Industry Insights: Beating the Economic Heat and Keeping Up with Compliance

The dog days of summer are ahead, and with inflation and high interest rates still sticking around, consumers in the U.S. will be feeling the heat financially. Consumer sentiment and data-based indicators tell some of the story, but what better way to gauge the consumer financial landscape than by looking at how people spend their free time and money?  While consumers embraced the ‘YOLO economy’ coming out of pandemic times - spending wildly on products and experiences - today’s high inflation, low savings and a cooling job market have shifted priorities for many, leading to weakened consumer spending. And businesses are responding accordingly to the lower demand - several top musical acts from Jennifer Lopez to the Black Keys have canceled summer tours due to low ticket sales while retailers like Walmart and Target are lowering prices on certain goods to appeal to budget-strained shoppers.  Despite families looking for ways to save this summer, their vacation plans must go on. The Transportation Security Authority has been anticipating and reporting record air travel numbers while a recent LendingTree survey found that 45% of parents go into debt to pay for a Disney vacation and few have regrets about it, indicating people will still prioritize spending for some experiences. Meanwhile, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has been busy, with new rules impacting lenders and collectors across the spectrum. What does this all mean and what’s the outlook for the second half of the year? Read on for our take on what’s impacting consumer finances, how consumers are reacting and what else you should be considering as it relates to debt collection in 2024. What’s Impacting Consumers? Inflation finally started slowing in May and then showed a decline in June, landing at 3% from a year ago and the lowest level in more than three years. Both headline and core inflation beat forecasts but housing costs continued to rise and remain a key contributor to inflation. Being heavily weighted in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) formula, it’s unlikely to see big drops in CPI until these costs start to fall. In June, Federal Reserve officials held the key rate steady and penciled in a single rate cut this year while forecasting four in 2025, reinforcing calls to keep borrowing costs higher for longer. Meanwhile, the labor market has moved close to its pre-pandemic state and the overall economy continues to grow at a solid pace. But even the 2% drop in the energy index won’t be enough to combat the inflated cost of keeping cool this summer, with predicted extreme heat set to drive home cooling costs up to a 10-year high. The average cost of keeping a home cool from June through September is set to reach $719, nearly 8% higher than last year and a big jump from the 2021 average of $573. Concerningly for lower-income households, organizations distributing federal financial support expect they’ll be able to help roughly one million fewer families pay their energy bills this year, in part due to government funding for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) falling by $2 billion from last fiscal year. Coming out of Q1, total household debt rose by $184 billion to reach $17.69 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s latest Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit. Mortgage and auto loan balances continued climbing, increasing to $12.44 trillion and $1.62 trillion respectively. Overall, delinquency indicators decreased positively as we moved through Q2 as seasonally expected, partly due to tax season. In May, overall delinquent balances (30+ DPD) increased by 3.46%, driven by a 6.06% increase in delinquent mortgage balances. But mortgage was an exception, not the norm: there was a 0.55% decrease MoM in 30+ DPD delinquent accounts overall.  Credit card balances also declined seasonally as expected in Q1 to $1.12 trillion, but new delinquencies rose with nearly 9% of credit card balances and 8% of auto loans transitioning into delinquency. Despite this latest decrease, credit card balances are still up $259 billion since the fourth quarter of 2021. Thanks to record interest rates, stubborn inflation and other economic factors, credit card balances are likely only going to climb, despite what we saw in the first half of the year. The verdict is still out on how those with student loans are faring with resumed payments. Missed federal student loan payments will not be reported to credit bureaus until the fourth quarter of 2024. Because of these policies, less than 1% of aggregate student debt was reported 90+ days delinquent or in default in the first half of the year and will remain low through the end of the year. Busy Season at the CFPB With a flurry of announcements in the past few months, the CFPB has been busy. The biggest win: a long-awaited United States Supreme Court decision came out in May ruling that the CFPB’s funding is constitutional, leaving the Bureau free to uphold its mission of protecting consumers and ensuring that all Americans are treated fairly by banks, lenders and other financial institutions. On the consumer fairness front, and after releasing research showing that 15 million Americans still have medical bills on their credit reports despite changes by Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, the CFPB proposed a rule to ban medical bills from credit reports, a move that would remove as much as $49 billion of medical debts that unjustly lower consumer credit scores. In another attempt to help consumers by bringing homeownership back into reach amidst high interest rates and home prices, the CFPB also started an inquiry into mortgage junk fees and excessive closing costs that can drain down payments and push up monthly mortgage costs. As related to business operations oversight, in June the CFPB issued a new circular on “unlawful and unenforceable contract terms and conditions in contracts for consumer financial products or services.” This warning makes it clear that it is a UDAAP (Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practice) to have an unlawful, unenforceable term in contracts with consumers. Later in June, the CFPB also finalized a new rule to establish a registry to detect and deter corporate offenders that have broken consumer laws and are subject to federal, state or local government or court orders. This registry will help the CFPB to identify repeat offenders and recidivism trends to hold businesses accountable as historically, nonbank entities faced inconsistent oversight, making it challenging for regulators to identify and address potential risks to consumers. As the CFPB works to accelerate the shift to open banking in the United States, it also announced a new rule establishing a process for recognizing data sharing standards and preventing dominant incumbents from inhibiting startups. At the end of June, the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine, a precedent that has allowed federal agencies like the CFPB significant authority to interpret ambiguous laws. This means that judges will use their own judgment to interpret laws rather than deferring to agency interpretations, making it easier to challenge and overturn agency regulations. As a result, the industry’s regulatory framework will become more unpredictable as courts take a larger role in interpreting laws and will require businesses to monitor and adapt their compliance and legal strategies. A Roller Coaster of Consumer Sentiment The first half of 2024 has been an economic roller coaster for consumer spending, resulting in whiplash for consumer sentiment. While the soft landing may still be on track, that track doesn’t appear to be as straightforward as hoped. There is an onslaught of mixed messages from, “consumers are proving to be more resilient than expected as they continue to spend, staving off what had been predicted to be an inevitable recession” to “consumers are actually financially stretched from depleting their pandemic-era savings and battling ongoing inflation and higher interest rates”. The latest Paycheck-to-Paycheck report from PYMNTS Intelligence found that as of March, 58% of all U.S. consumers live paycheck to paycheck, regardless of their income levels. Causes for this financial situation vary and range from insufficient income and family dependents to large debt balances and splurging unnecessarily. While financial goals also vary across consumer segments, paying down debt is one common goal across all generations: 15% of Gen Z, 20% of millennials, 23% of Gen X and 22% of baby boomers and seniors said repaying debt is a priority. Recent consumer surveys have found that 22% of respondents expressed feeling less discomfort about spending a lot of money when using a credit card, and more than half reported they are more likely to make impulse purchases when using cards. Whatever the sentiment, people are feeling some confidence to continue to spend and continue to carry a debt balance, with 41% of consumers reporting a revolving month-to-month balance on their credit cards. What Does This Mean for Debt Collection? Between these highs and lows of economic indicators and consumer sentiment, a serious fact remains for businesses: delinquency will continue to be an issue through 2024. For companies looking to recover those delinquent funds, understanding how to communicate with consumers where they are in this roller coaster can mean the difference between repayment and write-off. For lenders and collectors, here are some things to consider: Shift the collection mindset. Pivoting debt resolution operations from only being focused on roll rates and placements to a more consumer-centric engagement strategy is the first critical step to productively engaging consumers. Customization is key. Effective debt recovery communications will resonate with consumers and match where individuals are with the right message to engage with empathy and options for repayment; the right channel to engage through their preferred method of communication; and the right time to engage on their own terms when they are ready. Don’t skimp on compliance. Not only does following the rules of debt collection keep you out of hot water, adhering to the consumer-friendly rules will set up the best possible experience for consumers, leading to better engagement and repayment rates. Here’s a comprehensive look at what you need to know about collections compliance to get started. SOURCES: New York Times ABC News CNBC USA Today NBC News Federal Reserve Bank of New York Experian Ascend Market Insights Dashboard, Release 97 United States Supreme Court CFPB - Medical Bills CFPB - Unlawful Contract Terms CFPB - Open Banking Standards AccountsRecovery.net PYMNTS.com Payments Journal USA Today / LendingTree

Read More