Efficiency, accuracy, and compliance are critical in the fast-paced world of debt collection. TrueAccord, a leader in digital-first debt collection, is leveraging Robotic Process Automation (RPA) bots to transform the industry and improve operational efficiency, compliance efforts, and customer experience. At TrueAccord, we're not just collecting debt; we're revolutionizing the process with this kind of cutting-edge technology. These aren't your average macros; they're sophisticated software tools that automate repetitive tasks, freeing up our team to focus on more complex and strategic work. In this blog post, we’ll explore how TrueAccord is utilizing RPA technology, our unique approach to automation, and the benefits that this technology offers to our company and our clients. What is an RPA Bot? RPA bots are software tools designed to automate repetitive, rule-based tasks traditionally performed by humans. These bots interact with digital systems in the same way a human would—by clicking buttons, entering data, or reading information from documents. They can handle tasks like customer service inquiries, data entry, invoice processing, and report generation, improving efficiency and accuracy while reducing human error. RPA bots can even be strategically utilized to enhance first line controls and compliance monitoring, which are vital processes for debt collectors. RPA bots can be programmed to work across various applications and systems without needing complex integrations, making them a versatile solution for automating business operations. RPA is particularly valuable for organizations looking to improve productivity and reduce costs. By automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks, employees can focus on higher-value activities that require a nuanced approach or complex problem-solving. RPA bots can be set up quickly and are scalable, making them ideal for businesses of all sizes. As they operate 24/7 without the need for breaks or downtime, they can significantly enhance operational efficiency while ensuring consistency and speed in completing tasks. For example, when issues arise, there might be a need to update thousands of accounts. Previously, a human would have to manually go into each account, add a comment, and make necessary updates. With RPA, bots take care of this task in a fraction of the time, updating entire lists of accounts in minutes instead of hours or even days. How does TrueAccord Use RPA Bots? At TrueAccord, RPA is a key part of how we ensure compliance, respect consumer preferences, and drive better outcomes across the debt collection lifecycle. By automating previously manual tasks, RPA bots help us maintain accuracy, consistency, and adherence to regulatory requirements. Many of our bots operate through API (Application Programming Interface) calls, which connect directly to backend systems—making the processes faster, more reliable, and less prone to human error than traditional UI-based automation. What makes RPA even more powerful at TrueAccord is its ability to run continuously, 24/7. Unlike human workers, bots don’t need breaks (both from a stamina aspect and a HR/legal aspect), and they can work around the clock, completing tasks whenever necessary. This constant availability, paired with their ability to handle large volumes of work, turns RPA into a digital workforce capable of handling countless processes simultaneously. For instance, TrueAccord runs 45 different processes through RPA, including posting over 60,000 direct-to-creditor payments each month on behalf of just one client. This would have normally required an army of humans, but with RPA, the task is completed efficiently and accurately without mistakes like "fat-fingering" data. Enhancing Compliance and Customer Experience Compliance is a significant focus in the debt collection industry, and TrueAccord takes it seriously. The use of RPA bots helps ensure that processes are executed consistently and in line with legal and regulatory requirements. For example, when a consumer requests to opt-out of a communication channel such as email or text message, the bots automatically process this request, ensuring that the consumer's preferences are respected in real time. This helps TrueAccord remain compliant with regulations and provides a better experience for the consumer, as they don’t have to wait for a human to process their request. Beyond compliance, RPA is also improving the consumer experience. For example, when consumers respond to a text message or email communications, RPA bots can automatically pause the account, allowing time for review and ensuring that the consumer’s issue is addressed promptly. The Future of RPA at TrueAccord TrueAccord is not stopping at just using RPA for backend processes; we’re exploring new frontiers by combining RPA with Artificial Intelligence (AI). By integrating AI with RPA, TrueAccord aims to create an intelligent, self-sufficient digital workforce. AI acts as the "brain," interpreting consumer requests and generating responses, while RPA serves as the "muscle," executing tasks like updating accounts, posting notes, and more. This combination of AI and RPA has already shown significant results, such as faster response times and better consumer satisfaction. For example, where human agents might take days to respond to emails, AI-powered bots can provide answers in under 90 seconds, ensuring that consumers get quick and accurate responses. Over time, these innovations will continue to evolve, enabling even more intelligent and responsive automation. TrueAccord's RPA program is a testament to our commitment to innovation and efficiency. By developing our bots in-house with team members who understand our processes, we've created a robust and tailored system that truly makes a difference. We're not just keeping up with the industry—we're leading it. Ready to partner with an industry-leader in compliant digital-first debt collection? Schedule a consultation today!

APRIL 15 UPDATE: FCC GRANTS ACA’S PETITION TO EXTEND EFFECTIVE DATE On April 7, 2025, the Federal Communications Commission FCC issued an order granting a limited waiver that extends the effective date —for a full year—to April 11, 2026 of the revocation provisions from the February 2024 Order. The specific rule section that is being delayed is 47 CFR § 64.1200(a)(10) of the Commission’s Order requiring businesses to treat a consumer’s reasonable revocation to revoke consent as revocation for all future calls and texts to that phone number. That specific section reads in part:  “A called party may revoke prior express consent, including prior express written consent, to receive calls or text messages made [using an autodialer as defined by the TCPA, using a prerecorded voice, or to a subscriber on the do not call registry] by using any reasonable method to clearly express a desire not to receive further calls or text messages from the caller or sender.” No other rules adopted in the February 2024 Order are changed by the delay. The FCC decided to make these changes after receiving a request to delay the effective date from ACA International and several other associations (ABA, AFSA, Mortgage Bankers), explaining the implementation complications for both larger institutions having multiple business units and systems and smaller institutions having more manual processes and third party vendors to coordinate. The FCC rules allow for the Commission to consider and order such changes upon special circumstances that warrant a deviation, like undue hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy. The Commission found good cause to push back the effective date due to the challenges all businesses face in processing revocation requests across multiple business units, systems, and vendors.    The extension gives businesses more time to do two things: (1) implement changes across systems, units, and vendors to operationalize the rule and (2) file a comment identifying the same provision as an unduly burdensome rule by the April 28, 2025 comment deadline for the Commission’s deregulatory initiative. The blog post below was originally published on March 26, 2025 and has been updated to address the changes based on the new April 7, 2025 Order. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is seeking public input on identifying FCC rules for the purpose of alleviating unnecessary regulatory burdens. In a public notice released March 12, 2025, the FCC announced the Commission is seeking comments on deregulatory initiatives to identify and eliminate those that are unnecessary in light of current circumstances. The FCC notice stated: “in addition to imposing unnecessary burdens, unnecessary rules may stand in the way of deployment, expansion, competition, and technological innovation.” Reply comments are due by April 28, 2025. In the meantime, two FCC Orders that both impact the debt collection industry come into effect: A 2024 Order released last February impacting revocation of consent to receive autodialed calls and texts and prerecorded or artificial voice calls. The 2024 Order conflicts with the CFPB’s Regulation F Debt Collection Rule about the scope of an opt-out. And a 2025 Order released this past February aiming to strengthen call blocking of illegal calls. The 2025 Order may result in the blocking of lawful debt collection calls and texts. Debt collectors and other companies impacted by these two orders may want to submit comments to the FCC identifying the particularly burdensome aspects that could be revisited and slightly revised to be consistent with consumer preference, consistent with other laws and regulations (like Regulation F), and less burdensome on companies. Quick Note: These FCC rules are about the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which applies only to calls and texts made by an automated telephone dialing system (ATDS) and prerecorded or automated voice calls (aka robocalls or robotexts).1 If you do not use an ATDS to make calls or texts, and you don’t use prerecorded or automated voice calls, these Orders do not apply to your communications. I. 2024 Order - Special Revocation Rules On February 15, 2024, the FCC published an order adopting rules which impact text messaging and outbound dialing using an ATDS as well as calls made with prerecorded or automated voice. Most provisions of the Order take effect April 11, 2026.2 Those provisions include: Consumers can revoke consent by “any reasonable manner” If consent is revoked it applies to both “robo texts” and “robo calls” Companies must process do-not-call and consent revocations requests within a reasonable period of time not to exceed 10 business days of receipt. Originally these provisions were to take effect on April 11, 2025; however, in response to a petition from ACA International and other trade associations, the FCC on April 7, 2025 issued an order granting a limited waiver that gives companies an additional year to operationalize the revocation rules, changing the effective date to April 11, 2026.  The Order also limited senders of text messages made using an ATDS to a one-time, revocation-confirmation text. This provision took effect in April of 2024. a. Revoking consent is super flexible. The FCC Order establishes that consumers may revoke prior express consent for autodialed or prerecorded/artificial voice calls and texts in any reasonable manner. This means that companies cannot designate an exclusive means to revoke consent that precludes the use of any other reasonable method. A non-exhaustive list of “reasonable” ways a consumer can revoke consent include: Request made using an automated, interactive voice, or key press-activated opt-out mechanism on a robocall A response of “stop,” “quit,” “end,” “revoke,” “opt out,” “cancel,” or “unsubscribe,” or a similar, standard response message sent in reply to an incoming text message Request submitted at a website or telephone number provided to process opt-out requests If a sender uses a texting platform that does not allow two-way texting, the sender must clearly and conspicuously disclose in each text that (1) replying is unavailable and (2) provide the details of other reasonable alternative ways the consumer can revoke consent. If a consumer uses any reasonable method to revoke consent, the FCC considers that consent to be definitively revoked, and future robocalls and texts from that company must be stopped. Note that effective as of this April 11, 2025, a company must honor other revocation methods than key word replies to the text message. A consumer’s use of any other method to revoke consent, such as a voicemail to the sender's telephone number or email address, creates a rebuttable presumption that consent has been revoked. If there is ever a dispute about whether a consumer reasonably revoked consent, the sender has the burden to show why they did not treat the consumer’s communication as a revocation. b. Revocation applies to the number, not the channel. The Order states that when consent for autodialed calls or texts is revoked, that revocation extends to both robocalls and robotexts regardless of the channel used to communicate the revocation. It is the FCC’s position that a consumer grants consent to be contacted at a particular wireless phone number or residential line, and therefore, consent revocation is an instruction to no longer contact the consumer at that number. This FCC interpretation is different from the CFPB’s approach in Regulation F, which prevents debt collectors from contacting a consumer in a channel after the consumer opts out of communications in that channel. Under Regulation F, if a consumer opts-out from texts it does not require opting the consumer out of calls to that number. This FCC Order has a broader effect—if a consumer revokes consent to text by text, it requires opting the consumer out of all communications to that phone number (calls and texts). c. Ten business days to process revocation. The FCC now requires that companies honor opt-out/revocation requests within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 business days of receipt. The FCC chose 10 business days since it was consistent with the timeframe to process revocation requests under the CAN-SPAM rules. However, the FCC made clear that it will continue to monitor advances in technology to see if faster processing times may be warranted in the future, and it explicitly stated “[w]e encourage callers to honor such requests as soon as practicable as a best practice.” This particular provision is also at odds with the FDCPA, as the FDCPA does not contain language offering a reasonable processing time for opt-outs or any inbound requests (like cease and desist, notice of attorney representation, etc.). The CFPB did not provide any reasonable processing time for opt-outs in Regulation F. II. 2025 Order - Enhanced Call Blocking Rules On February 27, 2025, the FCC published an order seeking to strengthen the call blocking and robocall mitigation rules requiring all providers in the chain to block calls that are highly likely to be illegal based on a reasonable Do Not Originate (DNO) list. In the past, lawful debt collection calls have unfairly been blocked in these efforts. This Order has different effective dates but the earliest is May 2025. a. Every provider must block illegal calls. The FCC Order requires all providers in the call path to block calls that are “highly likely to be illegal” based on a reasonable DNO list. With this Order the FCC expands the requirement from prior Orders, now requiring all providers to block suspected illegal calls. FCC does not mandate a particular list for providers to use. This is because providers know their own networks and may be better positioned to determine what types of numbers should be prioritized. As long as the provider can show that the list is reasonable, the provider will be in compliance with the Order. Providers must constantly update the lists and will want to show that their list is comprehensive to safeguard consumers. This provision of the Order goes into effect 90 days after the order is published in the Federal Register. This order has not been published in the Federal Register as of the date of this blog post, but we should prepare for this rule to go into effect as early May 2025. b. Special code for immediate notification of blocking to a caller. The FCC has designed SIP Code 603+3 as the return call the provider must immediately use to notify callers when their calls are blocked based on “reasonable analytics.” This is the exclusive code for this purpose on IP networks. Using this code will ensure that callers learn when and why their calls are blocked based on reasonable analytics, which will allow these callers to access redress when blocking errors occur. This stems directly from the TRACED Act that requires the Commission to ensure that callers receive “transparency and effective redress” when their calls are blocked by analytics, and a single uniform code is the best way to achieve this transparency. This requirement only applies when the call is based on analytics. If a call is blocked based on a DNO list, there is no requirement to provide immediate notification. The Order further directs voice service providers to cease using the standard version of SIP code 603, or SIP codes 607 or 608, for this purpose. The Order does not provide any additional protections for lawful callers because the FCC does not adopt any requirements for blocking based on reasonable analytics and the blocking notification rules adopted in the Order are expansions of our existing rules, rather than wholly new requirements. The Order states: The record does not suggest that our current protections will be insufficient to protect lawful callers after these particular incremental expansions take effect. Moreover, and as discussed previously, we believe that the deployment of SIP code 603+ will provide significant benefit to callers that, when paired with our existing protections, are sufficient to protect the interests of callers. This provision of the Order goes into effect 12 months (one year) after the order is published in the Federal Register. This order has not been published in the Federal Register yet, but it could go into effect as early March 2026. c. No requirement to display caller name (yet). The FCC declined to require the display of caller name information when a provider chooses to display an indication that caller ID has been authenticated. Although it does not adopt such a mandate, the FCC urges providers to continue to develop next-generation tools, such as Rich Call Data (RCD) and branded calling solutions, to ensure that consumers receive this information and welcome any updates industry has on its progress. The FCC noted that it may consider a mandate in the future, particularly if the timely deployment of such valuable tools does not occur without Commission intervention. *This blog is not legal advice. Legal advice must be tailored to the particular facts and circumstances of each unique matter. Citations: An ATDS or autodialer under the TCPA is a system that has the capacity to use a random or sequential number generator to either store or produce phone numbers to be called. To learn more about this read this blog. The Order also limited senders of text messages made using an ATDS to a one-time, revocation-confirmation text. This provision took effect in April of 2024. A SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) code, also known as a SIP response code, is a three-digit numerical code used to indicate the status of a SIP request or transaction, similar to HTTP status codes.

In today’s world, connecting with consumers requires more than just making a phone call or sending a standard email, especially in the realm of debt recovery and collection. Navigating through the various strategies often feels like wading through a sea of acronyms and buzzwords. Terms like AI, machine learning, and data science can quickly become overwhelming or even feel interchangeable, leaving you unsure of what they actually mean and how they affect your business and bottom line. To help clear up the confusion, we’ve put together a glossary of key terms, definitions, and examples to help you make sense of it all: Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI is a broad field, which refers to the use of technologies to build machines and computers that have the ability to mimic cognitive functions associated with human intelligence. Big Data: This term means larger, more complex data sets. Big data can save collectors a lot of time by using many variables for analytics-based customer segmentation, insert, insert. Champion/Challenger: This model of A/B testing is a method for comparing the performance of a current strategy, agency, or software (the champion) to an alternative solution in the same category (the challenger), often used in debt collection to evaluate two agencies or service providers. Dark Patterns: A dark pattern (also known as a "deceptive design pattern") is a user interface or flow that has been crafted to trick users into doing things. Although dark patterns are often considered to be intentionally deceptive, poor design can inadvertently result in an unintended dark pattern. Data Science: ‍A cross-discipline combination of computer science, statistics, modeling, and AI that focuses on utilizing as much as it can from data-rich environments. Data science (which includes machine learning and AI) requires massive amounts of data from various sources (customer features such as debt information or engagement activity) in order to build the models to make intelligent business decisions. Data Mining: Data mining describes the process whereby you dig through data to discover hidden connections and patterns, and then use this data to predict future trends. Most often it uses a combination of machine learning and artificial intelligence and is very much related to Big Data. Digital Engagement Metrics: A range of key performance indicators (KPIs) that capture how effectively digital channels are reaching and engaging consumers. Digital Opt-In: The percentage of users who have indicated their preference to receive digital communications in a particular channel. Digital Opt-Out: Percentage of users who have requested to be removed from a specific communication channel or all lists owned by the sender. Opt-out requests can be relayed through a variety of words or phrases beyond the standard “STOP.” Domain Reputation: Domain reputation is the opinion receivers—including mailbox providers, ESPs, and other service providers—have of your domain, which helps them decide if your emails should make it to a recipient’s inbox instead of being rejected or ending up in a spam folder. Domain reputation is a key factor for email deliverability rates. Email Deliverability Rate: Deliverability, or inboxing rate, divides how many emails reach the recipient’s inbox, as opposed to their spam folder, by the total number of emails sent. Your deliverability is influenced by a variety of fluctuating factors, including Internet Service Providers (ISPs). Email Delivery Rate: Email Delivery Rate refers to the successful transmission of an email from the sender to the recipient’s mail server. It is the measurement of emails delivered divided by the number of emails sent. Bounces (when an email gets rejected by the mail server for any reason) and failures will impact this number. ESPs: Email service providers (ESPs) are a service that enables businesses to send emails and email campaigns to a list of subscribers. Generative AI: AI that creates new content. (Images, Text, Sound, etc.) ISPs: Internet Service Providers (ISPs) provide internet. Although ISPs can provide email services, separate ESPs are often used for business email operations—but ISPs play a major role in email delivery and landing in the recipient’s inbox. Machine Learning (ML): Machine learning is a subset of AI that automatically enables a machine or system to learn and improve from experience. Instead of explicit programming, machine learning uses algorithms to analyze large amounts of data, learn from the insights, and then make informed decisions. Mailbox Provider: A mailbox provider provides email hosting and implements email servers to send, receive, accept, and store email for the recipient. Mail Server: A mail server (also known as a mail transfer agent or MTA) is an application that receives incoming email from the sender and forwards outgoing messages for delivery to the recipient. MMS: An acronym that stands for Multimedia Messaging Service, similar to SMS, that allows for multimedia content like images, videos, and audio, along with longer text messages. Multi-channel: Multi-channel communication refers to the use of multiple, separate communication channels to reach a consumer—such as email, text messages, phone calls, letters, or even self-service portals—but each channel operates independently from the others, and there is little to no integration between them. Omnichannel: Omnichannel communication goes a step further than multi-channel communications by integrating all available channels to create a unified engagement strategy. Whether the debtor is engaging with a text message, phone call, email, or self-service portal, the consumer’s journey flows smoothly across these channels. Open Rate, Click-Through Rate: The percentage of users who are actually opening and clicking digital communications. Predictive Analytics: Predicting outcomes is one specific application of machine learning. It allows companies to predict which accounts are more likely to pay sooner and allows them to better plan operations accordingly. SaaS: Software as a Service (SaaS) is a cloud based technology that uses the internet to deliver an application which is owned, managed and developed by an external party. Normally run on a subscription basis, the software is usually not installed on the user's device. Scalability: In debt collection, scalability is the ability to handle more debt and customers while maintaining efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the operation, often involving or determined by the utilization of employees or third-party agencies, the application of different software, optimizing processes, and adopting new technologies. Self-Serve: A self-service or self-serve portal is a secure online platform or application designed to empower consumers to make payments and, ideally, allow them to manage their accounts and payment terms independently. SMS: An acronym that stands for “Short Message Service” referring to text messages on cellular devices, a key channel for today’s debt collection communication and consumer engagement strategies. Tech Debt: Often tech debt refers to the unnecessary reworking or refactoring of code, design, or implementation due to prioritizing speed over quality of work. For more information on how to get started integrating innovative technologies into your debt recovery strategy, schedule a consultation today»»

In today’s digital communication landscape, businesses—especially those that use digital outreach to engage delinquent consumers to collect debts—are facing increasing pressure to ensure they respect consumers opting out of communications from a particular channel. While the word "STOP" has been a widely recognized method for consumers to unsubscribe from text messages, the reality is that consumers may express their desire to opt out in various ways. And with the advent of accepting MMS (Multimedia Messaging Service) replies that allow for multimedia content like images, videos, and audio, along with longer text messages, consumers are bound to get creative. On top of consumer preferences, new and upcoming regulations from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) are making it crucial for businesses to go beyond just the word “STOP” and ensure they have a comprehensive system in place to honor opt-out requests promptly and accurately. Keeping Up with the Evolving Regulatory Landscape The FCC is currently revising its rules as part of efforts to reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens, particularly those that affect automated communications like debt collection calls and texts—a shift in policy could influence how businesses, especially those in debt collection, approach consumer opt-out requests.Two FCC orders in particular have direct consequences for companies that rely on automated communications, including debt collectors: 1. The 2024 FCC Order: Consumers can revoke consent for robocalls or robotexts in "any reasonable manner," making it vital for businesses to broaden their opt-out options beyond a single keyword like “STOP.” The revocation applies not only to the channel through which the request was made but also to any other forms of communication at that phone number. Businesses must process these requests promptly, no later than 10 business days. 2. The 2025 FCC Order: This order strengthens rules regarding call blocking, which may affect legitimate debt collection communications. It mandates that service providers block calls they deem "highly likely to be illegal," based on their internal Do Not Originate (DNO) lists. The risk is that legitimate calls could get mistakenly blocked, disrupting lawful debt collection efforts. Going Beyond “STOP”: Why It’s Essential for Businesses As these new FCC orders take effect, why else do businesses need to expand their opt-out processes? Let’s start by looking at existing regulations and requirements along with other factors that can impact an organization’s ability to engage consumers, collect debt, and ultimately their bottom line. Compliance and Legal Risk: By honoring only “STOP,” companies may miss other legitimate opt-out expressions, risking violations of regulations like the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) or the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Failure to comply can lead to legal consequences and damage to a business’s reputation. Efficiency: In industries like debt collection, where high volumes of communication are involved, a flexible, automated opt-out process can ensure that no consumer request is overlooked. Implementing technology to track and process these requests quickly is key to maintaining a streamlined, efficient operation. Technology and Innovation: The digital age demands businesses use advanced technology to manage consumer interactions effectively. Automating the opt-out process ensures that all channels are updated in real time, avoiding mistakes and minimizing delays. Consumer Trust: Consumers are more likely to engage with a company that respects their preferences and responds to opt-out requests quickly. Offering various opt-out methods and honoring them promptly can significantly improve customer experience. TrueAccord Leads the Way in Opt-Out Efficacy and Efficiency with RPA Bots At TrueAccord, we understand that consumer opt-out preferences must be managed with the utmost care. Using Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and artificial intelligence to automate back-office operations helps ensure compliance, improved customer experience, and a more cost-effective way to engage and collect. Automated Opt-Out Recognition: While many companies recognize the word “STOP” as an opt-out request, TrueAccord’s system goes further. We use AI tools to scan incoming messages for not just “STOP,” but also for variations like “revoke,” “quit,” “cancel,” and even unusual or colorful expressions of dissatisfaction. If a message contains any of these keywords, the bot automatically processes the opt-out request by unsubscribing the consumer from the SMS channel. Real-Time Compliance: Our system, powered by HeartBeat—TrueAccord's patented machine learning engine—ensures that consumer preferences are respected. If a consumer opts out of one communication channel, we ensure that all future communications to that particular channel are paused, preventing any further contact that could lead to complaints or violations. RPA Efficiency: Thanks to our RPA bots, tasks that once took hours or even days for human employees to manage are now completed in a matter of minutes. For example, our bots can process large volumes of responses, automatically unsubscribing consumers or flagging accounts for further review, reducing the time needed to comply with opt-out requests and ensuring that no request goes unnoticed. Advanced Reporting and Monitoring: We don’t just automate the opt-out process—we also track and report on all consumer interactions. This allows us to maintain a detailed audit trail for compliance purposes, ensuring that all opt-out requests are processed promptly and accurately. TrueAccord is committed to staying ahead of regulatory changes and technological advancements. As the FCC’s rules continue to evolve, we are constantly refining our processes to ensure we are not only compliant but also providing an exceptional consumer experience. What Does This Fish Mean to You? Navigating Opt-Outs Through MMS When it comes to consumers opting out of receiving TrueAccord communications through MMS, consumers can truly get creative: photos, memes, emojis, songs, selfies, and more. While text-based responses can be scanned and filtered, MMS is trickier. For MMS, the reviews need that human set of eyes. Why? Let’s use this actual consumer reply to a text message from TrueAccord that included the standard “STOP to opt-out” language: What does this fish mean to you? Specifically in the context of debt collection communications with a business, what action do you think the consumer is trying to invoke? While there are plenty of words and phrases you can program into a filter or scanner, this fish is not as easy to decipher the meaning. Automation takes the burden of basic reviewing off the shoulders of agents and allows bandwidth for examining the more creative responses and handling them appropriately. So if your debt collection partner is only using a rudimentary scanner for opt-outs, it’s likely that unique opt-out requests are falling through the cracks—and that’s if that partner even has an automated process to manage replies and responses in the first place. For businesses looking for a debt collection partner, this is a differentiator between choosing TrueAccord versus a competitor—our system is built on code-based compliance which allows us to communicate with consumers at a scale that's unimaginable from traditional call-and-collect or DIY collection programs. The more traditional operations that do not have these automated processes are also unable to keep up with the variety of replies consumers send to opt-out. Even if they have automation to send out mass volumes of emails or text messages, do they have automation to handle the volume of replies within regulatory timelines? Do they actually offer efficiency and scalability—or are they opening you up new compliance risks around opt-outs? Opt-In to a More Efficient and Effective Debt Collection and Consumer Communication Process In the ever-evolving landscape of consumer protection and compliance, businesses must be proactive in managing opt-out requests. It’s no longer enough to rely on a single keyword like “STOP.” As consumer expectations and regulatory requirements evolve, so too must the tools and technologies used to manage opt-outs. TrueAccord’s cutting-edge automation and machine learning technology leads the way in ensuring that consumer preferences are respected, compliance is maintained, and operations remain efficient. By embracing a more comprehensive, technology-driven approach to managing opt-outs, businesses can build trust with their customers, reduce legal risks, and stay ahead of the regulatory curve. Ready to opt-in to a more efficient and effective debt collection and consumer communication process? Schedule a consultation today»»

Debt collection is a complex, evolving industry, and compliance with the myriad of federal, state, and local laws is an ongoing challenge for organizations in the field. These laws create a "patchwork" of rules and regulations that can vary widely depending on the jurisdiction, presenting challenges for those trying to maintain compliance and provide effective, consumer-friendly services. Layers of Laws and a Patchwork of Regulations: Federal, State, Local The complexity of debt collection laws begins with the different layers of laws and regulations that businesses must adhere to. At the federal level, there are laws such as the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), and agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issue important rules and guidelines that debt collectors must follow. These federal laws and rules provide a broad framework, but when you layer on state and local laws and regulations, designing compliance with multiple competing frameworks becomes more complicated. For example, no consumer privacy law currently exists at the federal level, however, many states do have consumer privacy laws that provide consumers with the right to know what information is being collected about them, and the right to request that companies correct and/or delete their data. Some states provide an entity-level exemption to their privacy law (e.g., Colorado, Connecticut, Virginia) if a company is subject to the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA); however, other states may scope the exemption differently (e.g., California’s exemption is a data-level exemption, not an entity-level exemption). Depending on how a particular state shapes its laws, businesses and collectors must determine how to approach compliance in a way that harmonizes its policies and practices to comply with a patchwork of state laws governing privacy. Sometimes, even federal laws create a patchwork of requirements, such as the FCC's mandate regarding opt-out requests. The FCC has specified that opt-outs must be processed within a “reasonable” period of time not to exceed 10 days; while on the other hand, when it comes to debt collection and the CFPB's Regulation F, a reasonable time frame for processing opt-outs is not defined, suggesting that opt-outs must be processed immediately. This leaves businesses and agencies with a conundrum—do you follow the more lenient 10-day window and potentially strain consumer relationships if further outreach occurs within that window, or spend the additional resources to ensure immediate opt-outs? An additional layer of complexity comes from the different federal circuit courts in the United States. With 11 circuits, each containing multiple district courts, a ruling in one district may only be authoritative for that district. However, it may serve as persuasive authority for other jurisdictions. This decentralized legal landscape means that organizations must keep track of rulings that could affect how laws and regulations are interpreted in different regions. Even though not all court rulings carry the same weight across the country, they can still influence how the law evolves, and businesses like TrueAccord must stay informed of these rulings to adjust their practices accordingly. Turning Compliance Challenges into Opportunities The patchwork of laws and regulations presents an ongoing challenge, but at TrueAccord, we view this complexity as an opportunity. By staying actively involved in industry trade associations like the American Collectors Association (ACA) and Receivables Management Association International (RMAI), TrueAccord ensures it has a pulse on the latest developments. In addition to being part of these associations, TrueAccord leaders also participate in industry committees, allowing for deeper involvement on specific legal topics shaping the industry. It’s not just about staying current within the debt collection industry; looking to related industries can also provide a competitive advantage. For example, when the CFPB first came around, it borrowed many of its compliance concepts and requirements from the banking industry, which had been dealing with regulatory compliance for years. By keeping an eye on what’s happening in sister industries, TrueAccord has been able to anticipate changes before they hit the debt collection world and be proactive in its approach. An example of this proactive approach can be seen with the CAN-SPAM Act and opt-out requirements. While CAN-SPAM does not apply to the sending of debt collection emails, TrueAccord nonetheless looked at CAN-SPAM for best practices when it was designing its compliance policies around sending debt collection emails. Because of this, TrueAccord had adopted the policy of adding an opt-out to all outgoing debt collection emails before it was a requirement of Regulation F. When Regulation F mandated it, TrueAccord was already in compliance. Be Prepared to Stay Ahead of the Compliance Curve with the Right Collections Partner For businesses evaluating debt collection agencies, it is imperative to ask critical questions about how those agencies stay up to date on legal and regulatory changes. How do they manage change? How do they stay informed about new rules and updates? The answers to these questions will give businesses insight into how well a debt collection agency is equipped to navigate an ever-evolving compliance environment. As we’ve seen, the patchwork of debt collection laws—spanning federal, state, and local jurisdictions—presents an ongoing challenge for businesses. However, TrueAccord’s commitment to staying ahead of the game through active participation in industry associations, tracking legal rulings and regulatory updates, and applying a holistic compliance management system ensures that we remain at the forefront of industry trends, laws, and regulations. By continuously adapting to changes and leveraging insights from across industries, TrueAccord not only stays compliant but also advocates for a more cohesive, forward-thinking regulatory environment. For businesses evaluating debt collection agencies, understanding how those agencies manage compliance and change is a key factor in choosing the right partner. Ready to partner with an industry-leader in compliant digital-first debt collection? Schedule a consultation today!

Striving to deliver positive consumer experiences is not just a best practice—it is becoming a more prominent component of compliance in debt collection, especially when it comes to consumer communication. As consumer preferences have shifted toward digital channels, the success of a business’s debt recovery operation (whether in-house or outsourced to a third-party agency) hinges on engagement through online platforms, emails, and text messaging. However, without proper design or planning, digital outreach can cross a fine line becoming manipulative or even deceptive. These practices are known as "dark patterns," and they can cause significant harm to both consumers and businesses. The danger of dark patterns lies not just in the unethical manipulation of users but in the long-term consequences of such tactics, from damaged consumer trust to legal ramifications. But what exactly constitutes a dark pattern in digital communication? Let’s look at the official definitions and examples, the risks they pose to consumers, the consequences businesses can face, how to avoid inadvertent dark pattern design, and how TrueAccord has approached delivering consumer-centric debt collection communications since day one. What Are Dark Patterns? Examples, Risks, & Consequences Dark patterns are design practices that mislead or manipulate consumers into taking actions that do not align with their true intent or preferences. These tactics typically exploit psychological triggers, confusing language, and hidden choices to push users toward making decisions they might not otherwise make. In recent years, dark patterns have drawn increased scrutiny from federal and state regulators. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have made it clear that such practices are not just unethical but also illegal. According to the FTC, dark patterns are considered "unfair or deceptive" business practices under Section 5 of the FTC Act. In 2022, the FTC published a report titled “Bringing Dark Patterns to Light,” highlighting these manipulative tactics and the growing enforcement against them. The report honed in on four common dark pattern tactics: Burying key terms and junk fees Making it difficult to cancel subscriptions or charges Tricking consumers into sharing data Misleading consumers and disguising ads In addition to the focus areas within the FTC’s report, some other examples of dark patterns in digital communication include: Confirm-shaming: Using guilt-inducing language to discourage consumers from unsubscribing or opting out, such as “Are you sure you want to miss out on this exclusive offer?” Trick buttons: Designing "unsubscribe" buttons to look like "continue" or "learn more" buttons, leading users to click on something they didn’t intend to. Urgency tactics: Creating a false sense of urgency by suggesting a limited-time offer is about to expire, even when it isn’t. Pre-checked boxes: Adding pre-ticked boxes for additional services or subscriptions, requiring users to actively opt-out to avoid unwanted charges. These tactics are not just annoying for consumers—they also undermine trust in the brands that use them. In the context of debt collection, where trust is already fragile, dark patterns can have a particularly devastating impact. Dark patterns can cause businesses to lose credibility, customer loyalty, the ability for communications to get delivered through digital channels, and even revenue. When consumers feel manipulated, they may report a company’s emails as spam, impacting deliverability and overall the effectiveness of digital engagement. The risks of dark patterns go beyond consumer dissatisfaction and lower email open rates—they can lead to significant legal and financial consequences. Various laws, including the Consumer Protection Act of 2019 and regulations by the California Privacy Protection Agency, explicitly prohibit the use of dark patterns in obtaining consent for data collection. Violating these laws can result in penalties, along with further damage to a company’s reputation in the eyes of the consumer. In the long run, the use of dark patterns in digital communication risks creating a negative feedback loop: the more consumers feel misled, the less likely they are to engage with the business, and the less effective digital communications will be. This is why it's crucial for companies to adopt transparent, user-friendly practices. How to Avoid Dark Patterns Avoiding dark patterns is not just about following the law—it’s also about fostering trust and transparency with consumers. Here are some key strategies to ensure your digital communications are free from manipulation: Be Transparent: Clearly disclose all costs, fees, and terms. If there are any charges involved, they should be easy to find and understand. Use Clear, Honest Language: Avoid language that might mislead or confuse consumers. Be direct and straightforward. Avoid Manipulative Language: Never use guilt-tripping or fear-inducing tactics to push consumers into decisions. Simplify the Decision-Making Process: Make it easy for consumers to make informed decisions by avoiding "choice architecture" that limits their ability to make fair choices. Provide Symmetry in Choice: Ensure that privacy-protective options are as easy to select as less secure alternatives. Make it Easy to Opt-Out: Ensure that unsubscribe links or opt-out buttons are clearly visible and easy to use, without hidden steps or confusing layouts. How TrueAccord Leads the Way in Compliant Consumer Communications in Debt Collection At TrueAccord, we take pride in being a leader in ethical and compliant digital communication since our inception in 2013. We’ve always believed that transparent, user-friendly communication builds trust, which ultimately leads to better resolutions for consumers and better repayment rates for businesses. We make a concerted effort to ensure that our communications are free of dark patterns by focusing on both the design and messaging of our digital interactions. Our emails and text messages are carefully crafted to follow modern user experience (UX) standards, ensuring that they are clean, clear, and easily understood. Brand Consistency: Every message we send out follows consistent branding with the right colors, fonts, and logos. This helps consumers recognize us as a legitimate company and reduces the risk of being mistaken for a phishing scam. Clear Messaging: We prioritize clarity in our messaging. We make sure that everything we say is relevant, easy to understand, and free from confusing jargon or manipulative language. Error-Free Communication: We carefully review our content for any spelling or formatting errors. Consumers often make snap judgments about the legitimacy of a message based on visual cues, so it’s crucial to maintain a professional appearance. Easy Navigation: All our links work, and consumers are always redirected to the correct pages. If there’s ever an issue, we flag it quickly to ensure that the consumer experience remains seamless. Compliance and Trust: We are committed to being fully compliant with regulations, but more importantly, we focus on building trust with the consumer. By providing clear, actionable, and honest communication, we can help consumers navigate their debt repayment process more effectively. Moreover, our commitment to transparency ensures that every communication we send out, whether via email or mobile, is accompanied by clear disclosures to further legitimize our efforts and foster a stronger relationship with the consumer. As mentioned above, a lot of the regulations that have come out specifically about dark patterns have been in recent years. But with over a decade of experience in digital debt collection, it has always been our duty at TrueAccord to ensure we are not inadvertently causing dark patterns in communications or any part of the repayment process—not because it’s a compliance requirement but because we know that when a consumer trusts and engages with your communications, you have better liquidation results. Don’t Risk Dark Patterns—Partner with Experts in Collections & Compliance Dark patterns are a serious issue in digital communication, and while they may offer short-term gains, they can have long-lasting consequences on a company's reputation, legal standing, and customer trust. By avoiding these deceptive practices and focusing on transparent, honest, and user-friendly communications, businesses can build stronger relationships with their customers and avoid the legal pitfalls associated with dark patterns. At TrueAccord, we have always been at the forefront of recognizing the importance of ethical communication in debt collection. By prioritizing transparency, trust, and compliance, we not only ensure a better experience for consumers but also achieve better results for our clients. After all, when consumers trust the process, they are more likely to engage and succeed in resolving their debts—making for a better outcome for everyone involved. Ready to partner with an industry-leader in compliant digital-first debt collection? Schedule a consultation today! Sources: CFPB FTC

Over the past several years, federal and state regulators have started raising red flags about a significant trend in the debt collection industry: companies failing to deliver positive experiences for consumers or properly manage complaints and disputes. With growing scrutiny from agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and even the White House, it's clear that ensuring a good consumer experience is no longer just a best practice—it’s a compliance requirement. As we move further into 2025, it’s essential for debt collectors and businesses to find the balance between adhering to the myriad of regulations while maintaining a smooth and positive consumer experience through the repayment process. And while digital communication channels have become increasingly favored by consumers, mass blast emails and SMS campaigns don’t equal rave reviews or recovery rates. Add on evolving compliance regulations and the modern debt collection challenges mount. While 2024 saw different governing bodies and providers make progress handing down guidelines and best practices for better consumer experience overall, regulations and legislation is still not always 100% clear on what is and is not acceptable for compliance. So how can your debt collection strategy keep up with the 2025 compliance and consumer preference landscape? Let’s look at ways to navigate the challenges and increase liquidation rates as a result. Staying on Top of the Shift Toward a Consumer-Centric Compliance Model Traditionally, compliance in debt collection focused primarily on following established regulations, such as the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Regulation F. However, recent regulatory actions are increasingly examining how businesses interact with consumers beyond the letter of the law and have emphasized that poor consumer experiences can even trigger legal violations. If a debt collector fails to manage complaints and disputes properly, it could result in potential violations of the Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP) standards, or even the Dodd-Frank Act. Even the use of emerging technologies is being scrutinized through the consumer experience lens: the CFPB has highlighted concerns over poorly monitored artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning, specifically when it comes to consumer interactions. A poorly designed or maintained automated messaging system can lead to consumers getting “stuck” in automated loops, resulting in complaints and potential regulatory scrutiny or even rise to the level of a compliance issue. Another area of increasing consumer frustration can be the process of opting out from receiving further digital communications. Automated messages that give consumers the ability to remove themselves from receiving further communications by replying “STOP” but do not account for a range of possible opt-out requests or replies can lead to complaints and trigger regulatory action. The lesson is clear: compliance is not just about ticking boxes—it’s about delivering a consumer experience that’s transparent, responsive, and respectful. And with a smart approach, businesses can use technology to minimize compliance risk while enhancing the consumer experience. Best Practices to Strike Balance Between Compliance and Consumer Experience Understanding this focus shift and the nuances of ever-unfolding regulations still leaves us with the original question: how can your debt collection strategy keep up with the 2025 compliance and consumer preference landscape? While it is imperative to follow all laws and requirements in the collections industry, following the best practices below can help your organization prepare and provide the best consumer experience through the delinquency lifecycle as the regulatory landscape continues to evolve: Implement robust compliance oversight programs, particularly when scaling digital outreach efforts Establish clear policies and procedures around the use of AI, machine learning, and other emerging technologies in debt collection and digital communication, and continuously assess their impact Map and monitor outreach across all communication channels holistically, ensuring that consumers do not get “stuck” in a loop or experience any disruption in their communication Ensure any messaging systems appropriately handle variations in opt-out requests (like we mentioned above, “STOP” is just one way consumers might convey their opt out of SMS) Automation can be used not only to send messages but also to ensure that every piece of communication complies with the necessary regulations Partner with debt collection agencies that have experience successfully using digital communications compliantly The key is to adopt a comprehensive approach that blends technology, consumer insights, and compliance best practices. By leveraging digital tools to monitor communications, mapping out consumer journeys, and staying vigilant with AI and machine learning systems, businesses can maintain compliance without sacrificing the quality of the consumer experience. And TrueAccord has a proven track record as an industry leader in digital-first debt collection from both a compliance and consumer experience perspective. The TrueAccord Difference To start, TrueAccord is a licensed, bonded, and insured collection agency in all jurisdictions where we collect. We ensure compliance control, auditability, and real-time updates for changing rules and regulations, as well as adapting to shifting trends in consumer preference and behavior. Our digital collections compliance process is controlled by code, ensuring that all regulatory requirements are met, while still being flexible to quickly adjust to new rules, case law, and consumer experience expectations. Take the example from earlier about consumer frustration trying to opt-out: at TrueAccord, we’ve found that only 7% of consumers use the word “STOP” to opt out of SMS communications—but our team and machine learning engine, HeartBeat, account for the many other phrases consumers may use to opt-out, staying compliant and reducing consumer friction. It’s important to remember that most compliance rules were written for the benefit of consumers. As we’ve seen from today’s consumer-centric compliance guidelines, the better we comply, the better the consumer's experience should be. Ready to partner with an industry-leader in compliant digital-first debt collection? Schedule a consultation today!

Direct mail is the old-school method for reaching consumers regarding their debt, but over time several factors have reduced the effectiveness of letters in collection communications—consumer preference and cost being the most prevalent. But specific state compliance regulations and other use cases prove that “snail mail” still has its place in the omnichannel mix. When are Letters Necessary in Collection Communications? While the cost of physically mailing letters may be a deterrent to snail mail, businesses benefit when direct mail is used to meet compliance requirements. We’ll go into more detail around regulations in the next section. Another benefit of mailing letters is most apparent when the delinquent account does not have a valid email address or phone number on file. Letters ensure that these individuals still receive crucial notifications regarding their accounts, preventing any potential oversight, and provide essential information related to their debt in a clear and organized manner. Additionally, the formality of letters can be necessary to help raise awareness of outstanding debt for consumers that may not be as trusting of digital communications and choose to ignore phone calls. This is especially true for those who may not be as computer savvy or familiar with online financial transactions. And just like with all other communication channels in debt collection, consumer preference also plays a role but in an even greater way with traditional letters: if a consumer clearly states that they only want to be contacted through physical mail (either to them directly or to their legal representation), businesses and collectors must abide. These types of requests lead to the main use case for letters… The Main Use Case for Snail Mail: Compliance The primary use case for using the direct mail channel is for compliance. Several laws, regulations, and governing bodies—including the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Regulation F, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), among others—define how, when, and what needs to be included in consumer communications around debt collection, and letters were the original initial compliant consumer communication. Yet the prevalence of digital has forced these regulations to evolve, and today there is no federal law requiring consent to communicate via email vs direct mail. But there are some exceptions to this general rule: Some states/jurisdictions require consent to communicate via email and text, which must be obtained through physical letters and documentation. In some instances, consent to send legally required notices electronically must also be obtained through physical mail. Some states require certain legally required notices to be mailed. See Success and Real World Results with TrueAccord Understanding the nuances of compliance and when communications fall under certain laws can be challenging without legal experts keeping a finger on the pulse of these evolving regulations—but TrueAccord ensures success with code-based compliance so all our engagement channels meet the requirements for each unique account’s circumstance and know when letters are the right choice for outreach. While our omnichannel strategy is digital-first, we understand that digital isn’t always the best or most viable option to connect with some consumers. Knowing when, where, and why a letter might be the ideal choice for consumer communication helps TrueAccord and our clients remain compliant and cost-effective. Depending on a consumer’s location and contact information, a letter may be the best bet to garner engagement. With advanced code-based compliance and scrubbing capabilities, TrueAccord’s omnichannel approach proves even snail mail can still be effective in collections. Want to know more about how the omnichannel approach and how each channel influences the effectiveness of a business’s overall collection strategy? Download our new eBook, Omnichannel Communication in Debt Collection: An In-Depth Look at Advanced Engagement Strategy by Channel now»»

Keeping up with compliance in the debt collection industry can be a challenge—especially as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and other advanced technologies sweep through both the business and consumer sectors. In a webinar on January 29, 2025, industry experts Kelly Knepper-Stevens, TrueML Chief Legal Officer; Katie Neill, TrueAccord General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer; and Lauren Valenzuela, Retain by TrueML Products General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, shared insights from 2024 and influences on 2025. Let’s take a look at the takeaways from the webinar: Compliance & Regulatory News in 2024 One significant trend coming out of the regulations and consent orders in 2024 was focused around companies’ failure to deliver a positive experience for consumers, with federal and state regulatory action against companies who fail to properly manage complaints and disputes. The White House, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) all shared concerns that poor customer experiences may rise to the level of illegality. October 2024 saw the opening of the CFPB’s nonbank registry, aiming to create a single database of any nonbank entity that's received a consent order by requiring these entities to register when they have become subject to certain final public orders imposing obligations on them based on alleged violations of specified consumer-protection laws. The Department of Justice (DOJ) revised their Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs​ to include new areas of focus like technology risk, merger and acquisition integration, and additional questions related to autonomy and resource allocation and anti-retaliation programs. It places significant emphasis on the need for companies to implement structured processes to assess and manage risks tied to AI and other emerging technologies. These updates underscore the need for organizations and individuals subject to compliance measures to have a competency level when it comes to artificial intelligence and all of the various tools and solutions that may be used or inadvertently used through vendors. Additionally, last year email service providers began to roll out their own requirements, like Google's one-click unsubscribe in June 2024, which may negatively impact email sender reputation if not adhered to. While this is not the law, not following this requirement can lead to business emails missing the inbox and landing in spam instead—a major risk for deliverability and consumer engagement. Another digital channel got an update to best practices beyond direct Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or Regulation F guidelines as well: the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) published an order in February 2024 requiring companies using an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) for text messages to honor opt-outs within 10 business days of receipt. Currently the FDCPA doesn’t outline any type of processing time to opt-outs, but the FCC order does provide a new standard for industry best practices. What Do These Compliance & Regulatory Updates Mean for 2025? A key takeaway from all the many updates and introductions in 2024 is that not only should organizations make sure they are compliant with the law, but also look at the quality of the consumer's experience as companies evaluate their compliance programs. And while last year saw different governing bodies and providers make a lot of progress handing down guidelines and best practices for better consumer experience overall, our experts expect the next wave of successful new regulations to come from the states versus the federal legislation. That said, a particular proposal from 2021 has been reintroduced on the federal level, but is not expected to pass out of the House Financial Services Committee—which is a good thing for consumers and collectors alike when it comes to digital communications. Rep. Maxine Waters’ proposed debt collection legislation covers many articles, but the concerning portion focuses on introducing a nationwide prohibition from debt collectors reaching out to consumers by email and text message without the consumer's consent first, which is ultimately a ban on those channels because it's difficult to get a consumer on the phone to get them to opt in to those channels or to get them to respond to a letter. While it is not expected to pass, it is a prime example of the misunderstandings around these technologies and emphasizes the need to educate and advocate for digital adoption because consumers largely prefer these sorts of methods. Overall, businesses and collectors need to strike a balance in 2025 between maintaining compliance while also keeping up with consumers’ more digital preferences despite regulations and legislation not always being 100% clear on what is and is not acceptable for compliance. With that, one of the biggest opportunities and challenges for organizations and collectors in 2025 will be how to vet, adopt, and ensure compliance with exciting emerging technologies. Emerging Technologies: Benefits, Risks, and Looking Ahead at 2025 Think about ways that you can use technology to help you work smarter, better, faster, but also where pitfalls might be with that technology—this is the mantra moving forward. With technology getting smarter, especially for the digital communication landscape, it's significantly less expensive to send emails and SMS than it is to mail letters or place phone calls. It’s safe to say that if your organization is already utilizing digital channels, you will probably send more communications through those channels in 2025, which could expose some of the greater compliance risks in the new year without the right compliance programs and strategies in place. While consumer preferences consistently lean more towards digital, not all digital engagement is created equal—and poor consumer experience can be the result of poorly designed, implemented, or maintained digital outreach. And as noted above, a significant focus for staying compliant in 2025 hinges on consumer experience. In 2024, the CFPB identified one of their concerns over utilizing technology like AI is a lack of oversight, or even understanding of how to properly use it in consumer communications. There hasn't been any federal laws yet regarding the AI in debt collection, but federal agencies have put out significant guidance on using these advanced technologies and what sort of protections businesses need to have in place over them. The Department of Treasury is very interested in how organizations are using the AI technologies with several large sessions bringing in industry members and government regulators to talk about the risks and the benefits and what sort of controls would be best to put in place. While legislation and explicit regulations may still be in the works on a federal level, businesses should start to prepare now to find both higher chances for success and compliance in 2025. In a webinar poll, we found that when asked “Do you allow your employees to use LLMs like ChatGPT or Deep Seek?” attendees responded that 70% said a flat no, followed by 17% saying a straight yes, 3% unknown, and only 10% yes after they are vetted by info-sec and legal teams—we expect that 10% to grow exponentially further into the year as AI technologies become not only more prevalent and more accessible, but also more scrutinized on a business-level. One key directive any business should take away: start writing policies and procedures about this, including putting these sorts of things into your risk assessment annually, at least to be assessing whether or not this is bringing more risk than you want to your organizations. While using these emerging technologies does open organizations up to a new set of risks—both in compliance and overall consumer experience—using digital avenues for outbound communications can similarly be used for how your business manages compliance oversight of your processes. If you're leveraging an omnichannel engagement strategy, it can be default to view each channel in isolation, but there are compliance solutions that help map out and monitor your outreach across channels. It is crucial for the positive consumer experience—and in turn, compliance—to make sure consumers aren't getting stuck anywhere in your engagement process, to make sure your responses to your outbound digital communications are being scanned for different keywords and phraseology, just to name a few of the modern compliance elements. Can Your Business Future-Proof Its Compliance Program? As we saw in 2024, compliance and best practices can change rapidly but can also lag behind emerging technologies. Some of the best ways to future-proof your compliance strategy is to pull insights from the recent past, and 2025 has plenty to draw from. But one way to take some of the pressure off internal teams trying to keep up with compliance is by partnering with industry experts with a proven track record of being ahead of the curve—and in TrueAccord’s case, even helping influence them. Our perspective since our company’s inception in 2013 has been that legal compliance is at the forefront of understanding the future of the collections industry and what it means to prioritize consumers. TrueAccord is a licensed, bonded, and insured collection agency in all jurisdictions where we collect. Our legal team follows developments in regulations and case law to develop policies and procedures according to their constant changes. We ensure complete compliance control, auditability and real-time updates for changing rules and regulations. Our digital collections process is controlled by code, ensuring that all regulatory requirements are met, while still being flexible to quickly adjust to new rules and case law. Ready to partner with an industry-leader in compliant digital-first debt collection? Schedule a consultation today!

With consumer preferences leaning more and more towards digital communications, it can be easy to consider call centers for debt collection as a thing of the past. In fact, the first prediction of call center demise came in the year 2000 “Death of the Call Center”—but don’t completely cross off calling to recoup delinquent funds. Phone calls serve a valuable purpose in a fully omnichannel approach, in more ways than you may think… The Differences Between Outbound vs Inbound Calling—And Why Both Are Crucial in Debt Collection If your call center agents are only dialing out to reach delinquent consumers, you are missing out on opportunities to answer the phone for consumers ready to talk. Known as outbound vs inbound calling, both functions are vital components to a comprehensive omnichannel strategy. So what’s the difference between outbound vs inbound calling? OUTBOUND: Call center agents dial out directly to consumers INBOUND: Call center agents answer incoming calls made by consumers Whether agents are dialing out or answering the phones, calling has been a cornerstone of debt collection communications for decades, and its primary objective remains the same: recover owed money, negotiate and resolve issues, and arrange commitment for repayment plans. Even when consumers are conducting more and more financial transactions online, phones still have specific use cases businesses can’t afford to ignore when collecting debts. Use Cases and TrueAccord Success Stories Calling as part of the debt collection communication mix may be considered the old-school method, but its use cases remain relevant today: Lack of email or digital contact information Acquiring consent for digital communications where required Reaching consumers unresponsive to digital outreach Follow up on failed or missed payments And there are important use cases on the flipside of the phone line too. Allowing consumers to initiate contact through inbound calling can create a more accessible and manageable situation for consumers to negotiate repayment plans, particularly for those dealing with complex issues or disputes. At TrueAccord we are digital-first, but not digital-only. By providing phones as an active channel for engagement, we are able to reach consumers who may otherwise slip through the cracks of digital communication and support a wider range of consumers, empowering them to resolve their financial obligations effectively and recover delinquent funds more efficiently. “Thank you for working with me. TrueAccord is an amazing agency. Very flexible—just give them a call.” - Real consumer feedback Want to know more about how the omnichannel approach and how each channel influences the effectiveness of a business’s overall collection strategy? Download our new eBook, Omnichannel Communication in Debt Collection: An In-Depth Look at Advanced Engagement Strategy by Channel now»»