TrueAccord Expands Full-Lifecycle Support  with New First-Party Collection Services

By on February 11th, 2026 in Industry Insights
The blog title in front of a green and blue background.

TrueAccord is expanding its industry-leading recovery business to include a dedicated first-party collection service, designed to act as a seamless extension of clients’ brands. With this addition in the early-stage delinquency space, TrueAccord now offers a complete full-lifecycle recovery solution that bridges the gap between initial re-engagement and late-stage recoveries.

This first-party service, powered by TrueAccord’s subsidiary Sentry Credit, Inc., focuses on consumer engagement and retention rather than just liquidation. It utilizes a “HumAIn” approach to collections, supporting seasoned agents with advanced AI to deliver a brand-aware experience that feels like a natural extension of an internal team. 

“By expanding our services to address the full recovery lifecycle, we are bridging the gap between early-stage re-engagement and late-stage resolution,” said TrueAccord CEO Mark Ravanesi. “Our approach combines the precision of our machine learning engine with the empathy and experience of our professional collection team. Whether a consumer is just falling past due or is deep in the recovery funnel, they receive a convenient, digital-first experience that prioritizes retention and financial health while delivering the high-performance results our clients expect.” 

With a focus on positive consumer interactions and industry-leading recovery, this first-party expansion offers clients a seamless way to deliver their customers a consistent, empathetic experience from the very first delinquency communication. By leveraging the patented AI technology, TrueAccord eliminates guesswork and allows collections experts to focus on helping consumers find a sustainable way forward. The service is built to be both flexible and highly scalable, working directly from clients’ AR systems or its own CRM.

For more information about TrueAccord’s services, visit www.trueaccord.com or contact sales@trueaccord.com

Debunking 3 Common Digital Debt Collection Myths

By on February 3rd, 2026 in Industry Insights, Machine Learning, Product and Technology
The blog title set next to an image of a justice scale.

There’s no question that the debt collection industry is in a state of evolution, but one thing that persists, especially with change, is the emergence of myths. As more businesses are turning to a digital collection strategy, misconceptions are naturally going to arise with a new approach that focuses on email, text messages (such as SMS and MMS), and self-service portals. 

Let’s take a look at three of the most common digital debt collection myths, the truth behind them and how a digital-first approach to collections helps businesses. 

Myth 1: Self-Service Reduces Recovery Rates in Debt Collection

Experts agree that it’s likely this myth was born out of the dominance call-and-collect had over the industry for decades. In fact, many businesses still hold the opinion that direct contact from a staff member is the best way to improve recovery rates. The truth is that self-service portals not only improve recovery rates, but they are also preferred by the majority of consumers. 

A 2023 TransUnion data report showed that 60% of consumers prefer self-service options to resolve their debt. Self-service portals give consumers the added convenience of being able to view and manage their debt on their own time. Another study conducted by McKinsey found an increase of 15% for cured accounts after self-service options were implemented. 

The beauty of self-service is that it eliminates the “shame factor” many consumers experience when talking to someone directly about their debt. This comes into play when consumers are making decisions on which bills to prioritize. Roughly 14% of bill-payers identified “the ease of making a payment” as a key factor in their decision-making process. 

Myth 1 Status: Busted – Self-service options DO NOT reduce recovery rates. Your business could actually improve repayment performance by embracing this digital-first strategy. 

Myth 2: Digital Debt Collection Strategies Are Too Expensive

The debt collection industry is leveraging technology more than ever. When businesses see adjectives like “AI-powered”, automationor “digital communications”, there’s an assumption that these products and services are expensive. Even when a business is interested in taking a digital-first approach, the process of setting up email, text messages and other channels can seem costly to build from the ground up. 

While there’s always a cost to implementing digital debt collection strategies, the more traditional tactics are increasing in cost as well. For example, the cost of sending physical mail continues to increase, and businesses that rely heavily on call-and-collect often need to hire more staff to scale up collection efforts. A McKinsey report found that embracing a digital-first approach can lower the cost of collections by upwards of 15%. 

There are also collections platforms powered by machine learning like TrueAccord that use consumer engagement data to predict the next best step, making outreach more efficient. This approach paired with meeting consumers in the digital channels they prefer can improve recovery rates and help offset the cost of collections. 

Myth 2 Status: Busted – A digital-first approach to collections has the potential to help businesses recover more. Also, the increased cost to collect and agency fees often associated with traditional strategies aren’t present when the right digital-first approach is used. 

Myth 3: Consumers Find Collections Through Digital Channels Untrustworthy

A CNET survey found that a staggering 96% of U.S.consumers receive at least one scam message a week. There’s been a stark rise in financial scams, and many of these messages come through digital channels. This has led more businesses to think that consumers will likely find any collections outreach through digital channels untrustworthy. While this rationale makes sense, the truth is that many consumers prefer digital communications. 

Digital communication channels are key to omnichannel strategies that put consumers first. An omnichannel collections strategy means using multiple, often complementary channels to contact consumers in their preferred way. One of the key channels is email, which has gone from a “nice to have” for debt collection outreach to a necessity. In fact, surveys show that roughly 59.5% of consumers prefer to be contacted through email first. And when a business reaches out to a consumer through their preferred channel, it can lead to a more than 10% increase in payments. 

While more consumers are turned off to direct phone calls, businesses can still get attention on their device. Around 65% of consumers want their billing, payment and account information sent to them through text. A major reason consumers are gravitating more towards digital channels is because it empowers them to address the debt at their own pace 

Myth 3 Status: Busted – Even though financial scams have made consumers more careful with digital communications, their preferences for those channels still hold strong. By honoring those preferences, debt collection strategies can reach higher performance while improving customer satisfaction. 

See How a Digital-First Approach to Collections Could help Your Business

Even though we covered three of the most common digital debt collection myths, there are plenty more to navigate. By knowing the full capabilities of digital channels, your business can improve its collections strategy. The good news is that you don’t have to figure this out alone. 

TrueAccord is an industry leading debt collection agency that’s powered by patented machine learning to deliver a consumer friendly experience and improve collection results. Connect with our team today to unlock the potential of a digital-first approach.

Q4 2025 Industry Insights: Crowdfunding, Credit Cards, and a K-Shaped Economy

By on January 23rd, 2026 in Industry Insights
The blog title set in front of a green and blue background with a lightbulb graphic.

The cost of living continues to weigh on American consumers. While eggs are no longer the focus of food price pains, other household staples like coffee, beef, and candy have seen double-digit price increases over the past year. Grocery prices rose at the fastest pace in 3 years in December, and when combined with rising costs of other essentials, it’s concerning but not entirely surprising that consumers have turned to crowdfunding to cover basic needs. 

According to Bank of America economists, “The ‘K’ is here to stay”, referring to the duality seen between financial stability and spending of higher- and lower-income households. The top 5% of consumers drove the bulk of overall spending gains through late 2025, while lower-earners cut back on nonessential purchases amidst financial pressures. For those on the middle to lower end of the income spectrum, an unfavorable economic climate will put more strain on finances, leading to increased delinquency and the need for alternative sources of credit to make ends meet.

With new and persisting economic challenges and no indication of reprieve in sight, the year ahead coming out of 2025 looks challenging for consumers, especially those on the middle- to lower-end of the income spectrum. We’ve distilled the factors of the economic landscape and crafted recommendations to help borrowers, lenders, and collectors prepare accordingly.

Key Economic Indicators

The economic data from Q4 shows the financial hurdles facing many households. While the economy as a whole continues to move forward and looks strong on paper, the benefits are not being shared equally, and the real picture is complex below the surface, creating significant headwinds for a large portion of the population.

The job market has cooled significantly since earlier in the year, with employers adding only 50,000 jobs in December, and the unemployment rate settled at 4.4%. Long-term unemployment rose by nearly 400,000 people over the course of 2025.

Inflation still remains a primary concern. December data showed a 0.3% monthly increase in the CPI, with the annual rate holding at 2.7%. Essential costs continue to climb, especially shelter (up 3.2% annually) and food (up 2.4% annually).

In response to the cooling labor market, the Federal Open Market Committee lowered interest rates by 0.25% at its December meeting, landing at a target range of 3.50%–3.75%. This marked the third consecutive cut of the year, but expectations for multiple rate cuts, if any, in 2026 have dropped.

Household balance sheets are showing significant stress, with delinquency expectations having deteriorated to their highest levels since the pandemic. Notably, auto delinquencies reached 3.88% late in the year, the highest level in 15 years, and that’s not counting closed, charged off accounts. Foreclosure filings in December 2025 were up by 26% over November, having surged by 57% compared to the previous year.

Credit card delinquency gradually rose through the second half of 2025, both in terms of account volume and dollar balances, with 30-plus-day delinquency rates running higher than pre-pandemic levels. News early in 2026 about caps to interest rates has banks on edge, with potential implications for credit access at a time when consumers may need it most.

What’s Impacting Consumer Finances?

While higher earners are still faring well, lower-income Americans are struggling with wage stagnation that has not kept pace with the costs of living. Several specific factors are squeezing household budgets and making it harder for consumers to manage their financial obligations.

Grocery prices rose by 0.7% in December, the largest monthly gain since the peak inflation period in August 2022, and were up 2.4% over the previous year. Restaurants similarly felt this squeeze, and passed increases on to consumers, with costs for dining out rising by a similar amount, marking the largest monthly gain in three years. 

Utility prices are similarly starting to strain budgets, with electricity prices up almost 7% last year and natural gas reporting double-digit increases. This cost is expected to continue rising as data centers that provide the computing capacity and storage needed to power AI models add to power demands. Electricity costs near significant data center activity have increased as much as 267% per month, and as more data centers are constructed, more Americans should expect equivalent cost increases.

The federal student loan landscape is undergoing a major shift with big implications. The SAVE plan was shut down in late 2025 following a legal settlement, forcing millions of borrowers to transition to alternative, often more expensive, repayment plans. A combined 12 million borrowers are in various stages of delinquency, default or forbearance with uncertain offramps, and the Education Department announced plans to resume wage garnishment in early 2026. 

Health care costs are also going to be a big factor in budgets this year. Industry experts expect the premiums for employer-sponsored insurance have increased faster than overall inflation in 2025 and will likely do so again in 2026. Policies available on Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchanges are rising while tax subsidies for ACA coverage are expiring, which will raise rates for the 24 million people currently covered by ACA policies. For Medicaid recipients, new eligibility requirements under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will also raise health care costs or reduce availability altogether. 

What’s Impacting the Debt Collection Industry?

The debt collection industry is adapting to a regulatory environment that is becoming more localized and a technological landscape that demands greater attention to security.

The future of the CFPB is in flux as funding disputes continue. As of the time of this publication, Acting Director Russell Vought has asked the Federal Reserve for $145 million to fund the agency from January through March. He had previously moved to dissolve the CFPB, instructing staff to cease work and halting the agency’s funding. In the meantime, the agency is aggressively pursuing a deregulatory agenda.

As federal oversight wavers, states are stepping in. At least 14 states proposed legislation in 2025 to regulate financial products, with many laws taking effect late in 2025 or on January 1, 2026. For a quick summary of the key developments from 2025, take a look at this overview from TrueML’s legal team.

The push toward AI in financial services continues, but the PwC 2026 Global Digital Trust Insights report highlights that 47% of leaders cite a lack of qualified personnel as a top challenge. An undisputed point is that implementing AI must be paired with robust data protection to maintain “digital trust”, which is a concern for regulators, businesses, and consumers alike.

How Are Consumers Feeling About Their Financial Outlook?

Consumer sentiment reflects the deep anxieties revealed in the economic data. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index declined to 89.1 in December, with consumers’ assessment of their family financial situations turning negative for the first time in four years. 

The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index showed a slight rebound to 54.0 in early January, but this remains nearly 25% lower than the previous year. Furthermore, 47% of Americans believe they would not be able to find a good job in the current market.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s December 2025 Survey of Consumer Expectations agreed, with job finding expectations declining to a series low and job loss expectations also worsening. While spending and household income growth expectations remained mostly unchanged, delinquency expectations deteriorated to the highest level since the onset of the pandemic, and inflation expectations increased at the short-term outlook.

What Does This Mean for Debt Collection?

For businesses with financially stressed customers, navigating this challenging environment requires a strategy centered on empathy, awareness, and trust. Leveraging AI to do this at scale offers a path to success, but will require cautious, data-driven strategies and strengthened governance to navigate evolving risks and opportunities. Here are a few things to consider:

  • Consumer expectations have evolved, your strategy must adapt. Empathy, convenience, and a customized experience will go a long way in building goodwill with consumers in debt. If you’re still relying on calling alone to drive repayments, your collection results will likely show the impact of being behind-the-times this year.
  • AI is everywhere, but how you use it is key. Whether you’re using LLMs to write emails, chatbots to field consumer inquiries, or deeper, systemic AI, you’re going to need to keep an eye on evolving regulations, auditability, and data security concerns. For example, are you prepared for consumers using agentic AI for debt collection negotiations?
  • And keep the other eye on the rapidly evolving regulatory landscape. What happens next with the CFPB will have big impacts on businesses and consumers. But either way, states and the FTC are stepping in with their own priorities for both financial services and AI regulation. Strategies will need to be informed and agile to keep up.

Sources:

Anticipating the Trend: How Consumers Use AI for Debt Collection Negotiating

By on November 25th, 2025 in Industry Insights, Machine Learning
A robot working on a computer set behind the blog title.

You might have heard of Rocket Money before. It’s a subscription finance app for consumers that helps with budgeting and tracking spending. One of its core features is negotiating with companies on a user’s behalf to lower the monthly bills of streaming platforms, cell service and more. In many cases, this process uses agentic AI for the negotiation process – a tactic that consumers could adopt for themselves. 

Consumers are already using AI to help make financial decisions. LLM tools like ChatGPT will create a budget, and AI can be used to call stores to check stock and even make purchases. And with GenAI tools being widely available and incorporated into day-to-day tasks, consumers are even using AI to draft emails, scripts and texts to use in debt collection negotiation. 

The industry will see more consumers using the technology more heavily on their end as well.  In this blog we’re going to explore the emerging frontier of consumers using AI for debt settlement.    

Consumers Could Use Agentic AI to Call Debt Collectors in the Near Future

As AI becomes more widely accepted and used, consumers will likely start using AI agents to interact with debt collectors to try and resolve a debt. If consumers start using agentic AI to negotiate debts, there’s logistical and legal challenges that will arise.  

For example, if the AI agent does not identify itself as an AI (which is NOT considered to be current best practice for businesses), questions will arise around who the collector is speaking to and what authority they have.

Even if these AI agents have identifying information for the consumer, such as SSN, phone number and DOB, debt collectors will need to find ways to ensure that the AI is actually acting for the consumer and that it is not a bad actor. 

If a debt collector gets a call like this, it may be a scam. Industry experts say that if AI agents for consumers are regularly used, there has to be a dedicated verification step. This could mean the consumer getting on the phone to confirm their identity, or implementing some type of two-step verification system. Currently, the idea of an AI agent claiming to represent a consumer raises too many core issues for collectors. 

How Should Debt Collectors Treat Consumer AI Agents?

There’s a debate currently going on within the industry on how consumer AI agents should be treated if the trend develops. One view is that the AI should be seen as an extension of the consumer, just like a business’s use of AI is considered an extension of the business. Another is that the AI agent could be considered a third party, meaning the debt collector might not be allowed to share details of the debt. 

As the use of consumer AI agents grows, debt collectors will need to work out internal processes for how to manage these calls. Eric Nevels, Sr. Director of Operations Support at TrueAccord, says that until a legal precedent is set, businesses will need to create policies on whether to treat undeclared AI agents as the consumer or as a third party. 

The Most Popular Consumer AI Debt Collection Negotiation Tactics Used Today

AI agents are still a ways out from mass adoption by consumers. Most consumers using AI to help with debt collection negotiations do so by asking LLMs like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini for guidance on financial matters or to generate scripts to use when calling collectors to negotiate a debt. Many people don’t feel comfortable negotiating, and LLMs give consumers confidence by arming them with information and making them feel like they have an expert on their side.

The same approach is being used with collection emails and texts as well. Consumers can easily plug in digital debt collection messages into AI platforms to help decide the best way to respond. This makes the messaging of a debt collector’s emails and texts more important. For example, an email that uses aggressive language is more likely to cause an LLM to advise a consumer to dispute a debt. On the other hand, an empathetic message offering options could prompt AI platforms to encourage the consumer to work with that collector.    

Businesses need to be aware that consumers now have the ability to analyze large amounts of their own financial data to help inform what payments should be made to collectors. LLMs have already reached mass adoption by consumers and are much easier to use than a more complex agentic AI. Consumers can now plug in all their debts into AI platforms to get a recommendation on what to pay down first. It’s one of the reasons why businesses need to gain a deeper understanding of AI use in debt collection. 

Ready to Boost Your Collection Efforts with Industry Leading AI?

With more consumers using AI for debt settlement and negotiation, your business needs to provide a digital-friendly experience. TrueAccord uses Heartbeat, a patented machine learning engine that uses dynamic feedback combined with millions of customer interactions to figure out the best way to engage each consumer for better payment results. 

It’s a personalized, self-service experience that honors consumer preferences while driving more engagement. Contact us today to learn more about how TrueAccord uses AI to collect more from happier consumers. 

Q3 Industry Insights: Navigating a Divided Economy and Building Consumer Trust

By on October 27th, 2025 in Industry Insights
Q3 Insights 1920 × 1080 px 3

As we close the third quarter of 2025, the economic picture is becoming one of sharp contrasts. While some top-line indicators may appear stable, a closer look reveals a widening gap between high- and low-income Americans. The post-pandemic boom that briefly lifted lower-income workers has faded, leaving many families facing stagnant wages and rising costs for essentials. This growing financial strain is reflected in rising delinquencies and increasing consumer anxiety about the future.

For the debt collection industry, this moment demands a nuanced approach. The landscape is being reshaped by a complex interplay of economic pressures, a shifting regulatory environment and evolving consumer expectations around technology and security. As we look toward the final months of this year, understanding these dynamics is crucial for protecting your bottom line while treating consumers with the empathy they need.

Key Economic Indicators

The economic data from Q3 shows the financial hurdles  for many households. While the economy as a whole continues to move forward, the benefits are not being shared equally, creating significant headwinds for a large portion of the population. A prolonged government shutdown at the beginning of October has impacted the release of key economic data, shifting the focus to alternative sources and making it difficult to get an accurate reading of the situation.

The labor market is showing signs of stagnation and growing inequality. Amid the federal data blackout, experts have been watching nongovernment numbers from sources including Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and ADP, which are all telling the same story about fewer companies hiring in a job market that has cooled since the spring. August data revealed that low-income earners experienced their worst month for wage growth since 2016, while high-income earners saw their best since 2021. Meanwhile, jobless claims are ticking up, with estimates showing a rise to 235,000 in the last week of September.

Inflation remains the primary concern for American families, with September showing a 0.3% increase in the CPI, up to 3%. Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy, gained 0.2%. The index for gasoline rose 4.1% in September while energy rose 1.5%. Other indexes that increased over the month include food, shelter, airline fares, recreation, household furnishings and operations, and apparel. 

Forty-five percent of U.S. adults cite the rising cost of living as the most important economic issue they face, more than 30 points ahead of any other issue. This is compounded by costs of essentials like electricity, with prices climbing faster than the overall inflation rate. In response to these persistent pressures and concern with the state of the labor market, the Federal Open Market Committee lowered interest rates by .25% at its September meeting, landing at 4-4.25%. Two more rate cuts are widely expected before the end of 2025.

Household balance sheets are also showing significant signs of stress. Credit scores are dropping rapidly for many consumers as they fall behind on payments, with delinquency rates across multiple types of loans reaching heights not seen since the 2009 financial crisis. 

Auto loans are a particular area of concern, as surging car prices have pushed more buyers to take out longer loans, some extending to seven years. This has led to a spike in auto loan delinquencies, especially among lower-income consumers. Beyond auto debt, the number of homeowners facing foreclosure is also rising fast, with August foreclosure filings having risen six straight months year-over-year, up 18% from the same period in 2024.

What’s Impacting Consumer Finances?

Several specific factors are squeezing household budgets and making it harder for consumers to manage their financial obligations. First, the U.S. economy is increasingly divided. Higher earners are benefiting from strong investment portfolios and valuable homes, driving a larger share of consumer spending. At the same time, poorer Americans are dealing with flatlining wages, rising unemployment and punishing housing costs. For those in the middle, Q3 was a turning point in the economic outlook. Wages haven’t kept up with the cost of living and the softening job market has many on edge. Running out of savings to cover lingering high-rate credit card balances and auto loans, combined with renewed student loan payments, this cohort is more at risk than ever of falling behind and becoming more vulnerable to financial shocks.

Second, the resumption of student loan payments continues to ripple through the economy. With interest-free periods over, millions of borrowers are now facing renewed financial pressure, adding another significant monthly payment to budgets already strained by inflation. In what is good news for some, the Trump administration has agreed to resume student loan forgiveness for an estimated 2.5 million borrowers who are enrolled in certain federal repayment plans.

Third, as financial lives move increasingly online, consumers are growing more concerned about the safety of their data. A recent survey from Mastercard found that many people now believe it is harder to secure their digital assets than their physical ones. The report found that 78% of Americans are more concerned about cybersecurity than they were two years ago. This anxiety can create friction and mistrust, impacting how consumers engage with digital financial services, including online payment portals.

What’s Impacting the Debt Collection Industry?

The debt collection industry is adapting to a regulatory environment that is becoming more localized and a technological landscape that demands greater attention to security.

Despite the CFPB recently releasing a semi-annual rulemaking agenda, Russel Vought, the Director of Office Management & Budget and the acting director of the CFPB announced that the bureau is going to close in two to three months. However, such a closure would require an act of Congress, as the CFPB was established by statute under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Without congressional action, the agency cannot simply be dissolved by executive order or administrative decision. Vought’s statement therefore appears to reflect a political stance or intention to restructure or defund the agency, rather than an imminent legal reality. Nonetheless, the comment has sparked concern within financial sectors—including debt collection—about potential regulatory upheaval and uncertainty in the months ahead.

Meanwhile, a notable trend is emerging at the state level. As the CFPB pulls back, several states are stepping in with their own regulations and educational initiatives to govern collections and protect consumers. This is creating a more complex, state-by-state compliance map that requires diligent attention from the industry.

Despite the slowdown of CFPB oversight, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) remains focused on consumer harm and continues its crackdown on illegal collection practices, serving as a reminder that deceptive or harassing methods carry severe consequences. Adherence to both the letter and spirit of the law is paramount.

The push toward AI and digital communication continues to accelerate, especially in financial services. However, with rising consumer anxiety around cybersecurity, the implementation of these tools must be paired with a clear commitment to data protection. Building and maintaining digital trust is no longer just a best practice, it’s a business imperative. Navigating the emerging state-level laws and regulations around AI will become more important than ever.

How Are Consumers Feeling About Their Financial Outlook?

Consumer sentiment reflects the deep anxieties revealed in the economic data. Confidence is low, and worries about jobs and inflation are persistent. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Center for Microeconomic Data’s September Survey of Consumer Expectations, showed that households’ inflation expectations increased at the short- and longer-term horizons. Labor market expectations continued to deteriorate, with consumers reporting lower expected earnings growth, greater likelihoods of losing jobs and a higher likelihood of a rise in overall unemployment. 

The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index declined by 3.6 points in September to 94.2. The Expectations Index, which is based on consumers’ short-term outlook for income, business and labor market conditions, decreased by 1.3 points to 73.4. The present situation component, based on consumers’ assessment of current business and labor market conditions, registered its largest drop in a year, falling by 7 points to 125.4. Consumers’ assessment of business conditions was much less positive than in recent months, while their appraisal of current job availability fell for the ninth straight month to reach a new multiyear low.

The University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment index showed little change in October, down only 1.5 points from September. Decreases in sentiment among older consumers were offset by increases among younger ones. Overall, consumers don’t see much change in economic circumstances and inflation and high prices remain at the forefront of consumers’ concerns.

Other polls confirm this widespread unease, with pessimism about income prospects, combined with high inflation, that has left consumers feeling financially insecure. An Associated Press poll found that high prices for groceries, housing and health care persist as a fear for many households, while rising electricity bills and the cost of gas at the pump are also sources of anxiety. Additionally, 47% of Americans believe they would not be able to find a good job in the current market.

What Does This Mean for Debt Collection?

Navigating this challenging environment requires a strategy centered on empathy, awareness and trust. The economic pressures on consumers are real and significant, and successful engagement in debt collection depends on acknowledging their reality. Here are some tactics to consider:

  • Lead with Flexible Solutions: With so many households struggling, a one-size-fits-all approach is doomed to fail. Consumers need options, understanding and convenience. Offering self-service portals and flexible payment arrangements is critical. This empowers consumers to manage their debt on their own terms and demonstrates that you understand their financial situation.
  • Navigate the New Regulatory Patchwork: Compliance is no longer just about following federal rules. With states becoming more active, it’s essential to stay informed about local laws and regulations. Investing in compliance resources that track state-by-state changes will protect your business and ensure you are treating all consumers according to the specific laws that protect them.
  • Build Digital Trust: As you adopt AI and digital tools to improve efficiency, make security a cornerstone of your strategy. Clearly communicate your commitment to protecting consumer data and using safeguards. A secure and user-friendly digital experience not only meets consumer expectations for convenience but also addresses their growing fears about cybersecurity, building the trust necessary for productive engagement. Another way to build trust with consumers in debt collection? Social proof.

Sources:

The AI Regulatory Landscape Across the States: A Look At States Laws on AI

By on October 27th, 2025 in Compliance, Industry Insights, Machine Learning
The blog title set in front of an image that has a gavel sitting on a circuitboard.

There’s no shortage of federal regulations in the financial industry. However, there’s a noticeable absence of federal oversight when it comes to governance over artificial intelligence (AI). A regulatory vacuum around AI policies has emerged at the federal level, which has ceded the initiative to individual states. This has prompted a specific set of state regulatory models on AI that are pioneering risk frameworks and how they interact with various use cases like AI debt collection strategies. 

The process of navigating the state-led AI legislation and regulations in US financial services is complex, and requires specific industry knowledge. In this blog post, we’re going to dive into why states are leading the charge, and the type of landmark laws and regulations some states are enacting that are going to set the tone moving forward. 

Why AI Regulations Are Being Led By States

Back in July, the current administration released “America’s AI Action Plan”, which is focused on building AI infrastructure with over 90 policies with the goal of being a global leader. AI technology is rapidly being integrated into the US economy and financial services industry. While there have been multiple AI-focused bills introduced in Congress over the past few years (including two new bills in July of 2025), none of them have gained enough traction to get passed. This led to increased tension between federal and state governments, which came to a head once the “One Big Beautiful Bill” was passed on July 4th, 2025. 

Originally, there was a provision in the bill proposing a ten year moratorium on states enacting or enforcing their own laws on AI. This was a top priority for technology companies who were trying to avoid a more complex regulatory landscape, but the provision was stripped in the bill’s final version. Experts agree this move was a clear signal that states are going to be the primary architects of public policy governing AI for the foreseeable future. 

The Federal Stalemate in AI Regulations

One of the root causes for why there’s been federal inaction towards AI regulations is a debate about how the process should look. There is one perspective pushing for a technology-neutral approach, claiming that existing laws are enough to govern AI technology. For example, the existing US laws on discrimination, fraud or defamation already apply to AI technology and businesses, so no new laws would be required. In short, this outlook focuses on punishing bad outcomes from AI rather than trying to regulate the technology itself. 

At the other side of this debate are regulators who want rules surrounding AI technology itself. There has been a wave of state laws and regulations that support this approach with Colorado and California pushing new requirements to address AI. They’re not just retooling old laws, states are creating novel legal categories like deployers and developers of AI and assigning them proactive duties of care. It’s a stance that believes states laws on AI need to have specific and rigorous rules in place to better protect consumers.

The Pioneering State Laws on AI You Should Know

The Colorado AI Act (CAIA)

The Colorado AI Act (CAIA), was the first comprehensive, risk-based AI law in the United States that was enacted in May of 2024. The CAIA created a framework for creators and users of high-risk AI (which many financial applications fall into) to follow. The Act states that developers and deployers of AI technology have a duty of “reasonable care” to protect consumers from the risks posed by the technology. One of those top risks called out by the CAIA is called algorithmic discrimination, which is the unlawful differential treatment by AI technology of an individual or group of individuals that are part of a protected class. 

The duties for developers and deployers under CAIA are met if those parties adhere to these obligations: 

  • Developer Obligations: These makers of AI technologies have to provide extensive documentation on their products. This includes data on how the AI is trained, what steps are made by the developer to prevent bias, what the foreseeable use cases of technology are and more. Developers also have to notify the Colorado Attorney General within 90 days if their AI technology has caused or is likely to cause an algorithmic discrimination. 
  • Deployer Obligations: Deployers (like a company using AI for debt collection), are required to implement and maintain a risk management program. They also have to perform annual assessments of AI technologies and notify consumers of changes being made. Consumers also have the right to correct any inaccurate data being used by AI systems with the right to appeal any decision they don’t agree with by human review.

The Financial Compliance Exception for Colorado’s AI Act

In Colorado’s AI Act, there’s an important provision for the financial industry and companies using AI for debt collection. The CAIA says that financial institutions such as banks, credit unions and insurers are considered to be already in full compliance with its requirements. However, this provision doesn’t provide universal protection. 

This exemption pressures federal agencies and other state banking institutions to develop their own AI governance rules. If they don’t, financial institutions that do business in Colorado could face punitive actions through CAIA. This law is set to indirectly influence the development of national AI regulation standards by creating the bar that other regulators have to meet.

California’s Draft Regulations for Automated Decision Making Technology

Another standout in state AI regulations is California’s draft regulations for Automated Decisionmaking Technology (ADMT). At this time, the draft regulations were approved and will go into effect on January 1, 2026, and they do represent the most consumer rights-focused AI regulations in the US. The regulations are designed for businesses that use ADMT to make important decisions about consumers. The state law definition of “important or significant decisions” includes financial services, lending, debt collection, insurance and much more. 

Since consumer well-being is at the core of these draft AI regulations, California is trying to establish three core rights: 

  1. Right to a Pre-Use Notice: Before a business uses ADMT for an important decision, they have to notify consumers explaining how the AI technology works in a way that’s easy for them to understand. 
  1. Right to Opt Out: Consumers have the right to tell businesses that they don’t want ADMT to be used for making important decisions about them. 
  1. Right to Access Information: Consumers will have the right to request information about the logic being used in ADMT processes. For financial institutions, this means businesses won’t be able to just deploy AI technology into their operations without having a deep understanding of how it works. 

Many experts say that these rights will cause a shift in how financial institutions interact with vendors who provide AI technology. The ability to easily explain the technology will go from being a nice-to-have, to a requirement. It’s likely there will also be an overhaul of risk management for AI technology vendors. Due diligence being done for these partnerships will have to go deeper to ensure that these new consumer rights are being honored.

What Does This Mean for AI Debt Collection?

AI in debt collection continues to increase in adoption because of how it lets businesses better honor consumer preferences while being able to scale. As bellwether states like Colorado and California are setting the standards for other states to follow, the laws and regulations surrounding AI are shaping up to be a patchwork system similar to that of debt collection compliance. 

For businesses that are looking to benefit from using AI in debt collection, you need a partner who’s an expert in compliance and keeping up state law and regulation developments. The state laws and regulations around AI are going to evolve just as fast, if not faster than debt collection rules. Debt collection strategies that are set up to quickly adapt are the most likely to achieve long-term success.

TrueAccord Is Built to Keep Up with Compliance and AI Changes

TrueAccord is an industry-leading recovery and collections platform that’s powered by patented machine learning. Our legal team follows developments in industry regulation updates across the country and maintains machine learning governance models to ensure complete compliance control

When the world is changing fast, you want a debt collection partner that has proven flexibility to quickly adjust to new rules and regulations. Contact us today and learn more about how you can collect more from happier people.

The Importance of Social Proof in Debt Collection

By on September 17th, 2025 in Industry Insights, Customer Experience, Machine Learning
The blog title set in front of a person leaving a customer review on their phone.

It’s common when you put a debt collection company’s name in a search engine, one of the most popular queries is asking if the business is legit. For many consumers, there’s an inherent doubt that comes with receiving a debt collection communication, which often leads to the message being ignored. 

If a consumer gets reassurance from an unbiased source (like another consumer), any doubts about interacting with the company often fade away. This concept is called social proof, and it’s extremely important in the debt collection industry. Let’s take a closer look at the relationship between social proof and debt collection. 

Social Proof Starts with Ethical Debt Collection Practices

The process of having and paying back a debt can be a stressful experience for many consumers, especially when facing financial hardship. It’s an expereince that is more intense and nerve wracking when companies use aggressive collection tactics like excessive calling or threatening. These more forceful approaches are part of the reason why many consumers doubt the legitimacy of debt collection messages. 

The first step in reducing consumer uncertainty is practicing ethical and consumer-friendly debt collection. It’s why more companies are taking an omnichannel approach to sending repayment notifications. Digital communication channels like email and SMS/text give consumers more opportunity to engage with messages on their own terms. When the ask for a repayment is more humane, a consumer is not only more likely to act on it, but share their positive experience with others or online. 

When a consumer sees that someone else had a positive experience with a certain debt collector, it can reduce their anxiety about getting a repayment notification. Oftentimes a few positive affirmations from people in a similar financial situation is the difference between making a payment and ignoring a message. 

Social Proof Can Encourage More Engagement from Consumers

When a consumer receives a debt collection notification, they might feel alone, isolated and unsure of the best way to handle the situation. In fact, this is a common reaction for many stressful events we experience in life. In these situations, many people’s first instinct is to seek advice from others who can relate to their circumstances. For example, if they hear from another consumer that the process of making a payment was easy, engaging with the notification doesn’t feel as intimidating. 

Debt collection companies themselves can also offer consumers social proof. A great way to do this is by providing insight into how other customers handled their financial obligations. If your business sends an email notification to a customer, you could offer examples of how other customers with a similar balance chose a payment plan to resolve their debt. A subtle tip on how others in their situation took action can increase the likelihood of that customer making a repayment. 

The connecting thread between both these instances of social proof aren’t phrasing things as a demand, they’re suggestions backed by the experience of peers. That’s the core of social proof that can increase repayment rates and build trust with consumers. 

Social Proof Helps to Humanize Debt Collection

Social proof has the power to turn the perception of a debt collector from an intimidating unknown to a partner that helps people with financial wellness. By putting this notion into practice, debt collectors can improve their reputation with consumers. What does this look like in action? Here’s a few ways debt collection companies can bring this to life: 

  • Leverage AI in Debt Collection: AI can be used in debt collection to create a better experience for consumers. Machine learning platforms can figure out the best way to honor each individual customer’s communication preferences. These AI processes help make the customer feel more valued, improving the likelihood they will share their experience. 

It’s important that all social proof strategies being used by debt collectors follow legal guidelines and don’t overstep on customer privacy. The power of social proof is its honesty, transparency and ethical use. When it is used responsibly and paired with other strategies like leveraging AI in debt collection, social proof can improve recovery rates. 

Boost Recovery Rates with AI Debt Collection Strategies

Social proof and AI debt collection strategies are a great way for businesses to collect more from happier people. If you want to empower your debt collection solutions with machine learning and a consumer-first mindset, TrueAccord is here to help. 

Contact our team today to learn more about how we can handle all your delinquency needs.     

How Student Loan Debt is Impacting the Debt Collection Industry

By on August 8th, 2025 in Industry Insights, Customer Experience, Machine Learning
The blog title set in front of a piggy bank wearing a graduation cap.

The path to getting a higher education is a courageous decision that millions of Americans start each year when attending college. It sets the foundation for countless careers and drives personal growth that lasts a lifetime. However, education is expensive and paying back the loans can be challenging—an estimated 5.8 million student loan borrowers have delinquent accounts. 

This number could get even higher with student loan forgiveness ending, interest on the debt resuming and shifts repayment options. Student loans and debt collection servicing have always shared a close relationship. And the current changes to the federal student loan system is primed to send shockwaves through debt collection services across the nation. 

Learn how student loans have changed in 2025 and trends your business needs to look out for as the situation continues to evolve. 

How Student Loans Have Changes in 2025

Before we dive into the implications for the debt collection industry, it’s important to understand some of the key changes recently made to federal student loans. The current administration signed into law the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” on July 4th, 2025. This legislation overhauled the student loan system: 

  • Student Loan Forgiveness Paused: Borrowers on SAVE plans are seeing the end of payment forgiveness. Right now, payments are required and accruing interest on loans restarted on August 1st, 2025. 
  • Creation of Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP): RAP is an income-based plan for new borrowers that requires a minimum payment regardless of a person’s income level. This plan will only be approved for cancellation after 30 years of qualifying payments. 

Student Loans and Their Impact on Debt Collection 

One of the biggest and most immediate effects that student loans will have on debt collection solutions is a surge of collection activity. With loan forgiveness paused, the millions of delinquent accounts are going to be subject to collection efforts. To start, the federal government is putting increased focus on accounts that are 60 days or more delinquent. 

This means that standard debt collection communications channels like phone calls and physical mail are going to be much more crowded for the foreseeable future. It’s also likely that some customers your business talks to have this type of financial obligation. That means no matter what debt type you’re collecting, there is more competition to get their attention through non-digital channels and less funds available to repay debts. 

We Could See An Increase in Involuntary Collection Tools 

When a consumer defaults on their student loan debt, the federal government has strong tools to help them collect payments. After 270 days pass without a payment being made, the government can garish up to 15% of the borrower’s paycheck. Any federal tax refunds can also be withheld and applied to the loan. 

Any student loan accounts that are in delinquency or have defaulted can also be reported to national credit bureaus, causing damage to the borrower’s credit score. Consumers who are going through this process may be less likely to make payments on other debts while they try to keep up with student loans. The common thread is that more student loan borrowers could have reduced disposable income once all the changes take effect. 

New Student Loan Rules Could Lower Credit Scores 

Experts agree that the new student loan rules have a strong possibility of lowering credit scores for existing borrowers. Since the payment forgiveness that started shortly before COVID is ending, borrowers will likely need time to make payments as other costly necessities (like the rise of grocery costs) take their attention. 

It’s possible that this will have widespread effects on consumer credit scores, making it more difficult for these borrowers to participate in the financial system. Specifically for student loans, a lower credit score makes it harder for borrowers to consolidate the debt at an affordable interest rate. 

A lower credit score also makes it more difficult to access new lines of credit, a common tactic consumers use to pay off debt. Borrowers with a lower credit score will get higher interest rates on new loans, making it more expensive to get loans and more likely that payments made on debts will be in smaller amounts. To help navigate this challenge, debt collection services that offer consumers more payment options could have greater success.  

Increase Your Collections Performance with an Industry Leading Platform

Student loan debt is primed to have a lasting impact on debt collection solutions. If you want to leverage AI that adapts to these situational challenges to collect more from happier people, TrueAccord is here to help

If you want to empower your debt collection solutions with machine learning and a consumer-friendly digital experience, contact our sales team today 

Q2 Industry Insights: Reconciling consumer, economic indicators and embracing AI

By on July 29th, 2025 in Industry Insights, Customer Experience, Machine Learning
The blog title with an illustration of a lightbulb.

Despite economic uncertainty, Americans continue to spend, albeit what they’re spending on has shifted. After two consecutive months of reduced spending, consumers came back in June with purchasing focused heavily on necessities like clothing and personal care, rather than electronics or appliances. Discretionary spending also stayed strong on restaurants and bars, indicating that while consumers are feeling some amount of pressure from the economy, it hasn’t really hit their wallets just yet. But economists and key indicators are foretelling more financial challenges ahead, so consumer sentiment may not be keeping up with reality.

The debt collection industry is navigating a period of transformation via a combination of regulatory shifts, technological advancements and evolving economic pressures. Key developments continue to reshape collection strategies, compliance requirements and the tools used to recover outstanding debts. As you protect your bottom line in a rapidly evolving consumer financial landscape, let’s look at what you should consider as it relates to debt collection with an eye toward the second half of 2025.

Key Economic Indicators

After several months of speculation and fluctuation, inflation is starting to heat back up, potentially showing the first impacts of tariffs and signaling what’s ahead. Consumer prices rose 0.3% in June after rising 0.1% in May, pushing the annual CPI inflation rate higher to 2.7%, the highest since February. The increase was driven by higher gas prices and a broad assortment of goods showing the effects of businesses sharing higher import costs with consumers.

On the jobs front, the economy added 110,000 jobs in June. Looking at the number of jobs added through the first part of the year shows an average of 124,000 jobs per month, which is significantly lower than last year’s monthly average of 168,000. With layoff activity relatively low and wage growth remaining decent, economic uncertainty has slowed the pace of hiring and created a somewhat stagnant employment market.

The Federal Open Market Committee held rates steady at 4.25-4.50% at their meeting in mid-June, and Wall Street economists are predicting the central bank to continue their wait-and-see approach at their next meeting in July given June’s reported CPI and expected PCE inflation increases. Bets are now on a September rate cut if the inflation threat cools and the jobs market weakens more noticeably.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s latest Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit for Q1 2025 showed that total household debt in the US reached $18.20 trillion, a $167 billion or 0.97% increase from the prior quarter. This growth was primarily driven by increases in student loan and mortgage balances, while credit card and auto loan balances decreased. The report showed delinquency rates rising, with 4.3% of outstanding debt in some stage of delinquency, the highest level since the beginning of 2020.  

Mortgage loans experienced a significant rise in early and mid-stage delinquencies across all credit categories in May. Mortgage delinquencies increased to 1.03% from 0.92% the previous month, suggesting that the housing market might be showing initial indicators of financial strain among homeowners.

What’s Impacting Consumer Finances?

Just as more student loan delinquencies are reported and sent to collections, borrowers who had previously been granted an interest-free forbearance period under the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan will lose those benefits. On August 1, the administration will resume interest charges on the accounts of around 8 million borrowers as the SAVE program and several other income-driven payment options end. Overall, the change will see borrowers being charged more than $27 billion in interest over the next 12 months, which will have wide repercussions on students and families.

And in a reversal of a move by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) earlier this year, a federal judge recently blocked a rule that would have removed unpaid medical debt from the credit reports of about 15 million consumers who carry a total of roughly $49 billion in medical debt. This financial burden could influence creditworthiness and access to loans for many.

What’s Impacting the Debt Collection Industry?

On the federal level, the CFPB has announced a new set of supervision and enforcement priorities for 2025. The bureau intends to reduce the number of its supervisory exams, focusing instead on cases of tangible consumer harm and actual fraud. While this may mean fewer routine audits for collection agencies, it signals more intense scrutiny on practices that directly and negatively impact consumers, with a continued focus on areas including mortgages, credit reporting, and FCRA and FDCPA violations.

In June, the CFPB also published a policy statement in the Federal Register outlining its approach to addressing criminally liable regulatory offenses under statutes including the Consumer Financial Protection Act and Truth in Lending Act, among others.

In efforts to enhance efficiency, the debt collection industry is rapidly embracing new technologies, and artificial intelligence (AI) and digital communication platforms are at the forefront of this technological wave. AI is being leveraged more widely to personalize consumer engagement, predict payment likelihood, and optimize collection strategies. Meanwhile, digital channels like Rich Communication Services (RCS) are gaining traction as innovative methods for consumer contact, offering more interactive and self-service options.

However, the use of technology and collection tactics remains under the watchful eye of regulators. In a significant enforcement action in June 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) secured a permanent ban against a debt collection operation found to be using deceptive and harassing methods to collect on “phantom debts.” This action underscores the agency’s ongoing commitment to cracking down on illegal collection practices and serves as a reminder to the industry of the severe consequences of non-compliance.

How are consumers feeling about their financial outlook?

In analyzing consumer sentiment, it’s important to note that the following surveys relay responses may have been taken before the latest inflation figures were released, so there may be an incongruity in reporting. 

The Fed’s June Survey of Consumer Expectations showed that households’ inflation expectations decreased at the short-term and remained unchanged at the medium- and longer-term periods. Unemployment job loss and household income growth expectations improved while spending growth expectations slightly declined. In general, households were more optimistic about their year-ahead financial outlook.

The latest University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey, reporting from mid-way through July, showed that Consumer sentiment ticked up about one index point to 61.8 from June, reaching its highest value in five months, but still 16% below December 2024 and its historical average. Expected personal finances fell back about 4%, with the report noting that consumers are unlikely to regain their economic confidence until they feel assured that inflation is unlikely to rise.

The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index deteriorated by 5.4 points in June, falling to 93.0 from 98.4 in May. The report showed less positivity about current business conditions and job availability, as well as more pessimism about business conditions, job availability and income prospects over the next six months.

What Does This Mean for Debt Collection?

The debt collection industry in mid-2025 is at a pivotal juncture, tasked with balancing the adoption of powerful new technologies and navigating a challenging economic environment while adhering to an evolving regulatory framework. The ability to adapt to these concurrent trends will mean success for businesses in this sector. For lenders and collectors, here are a few things to keep in mind:

  1. Consumers expect more in debt collection. Gone are the days of debt collection letters or calls from unknown numbers eliciting a productive response. Now, consumers want empathy, understanding and convenience in their financial matters. Keeping up with consumer expectations can mean the difference between collecting debt and not.
  1. Self-service is one of those key expectations. Convenience by way of self-serving is a win-win for your business and consumers. Offering a comprehensive self-serve portal means consumers can engage whenever they want (even outside traditional FDCPA-regulated hours) and reduces resources needed to manage accounts and process payments.
  1. Ready or not, AI is here. Technology is already transforming debt collection by changing the way lenders and collectors engage with consumers, and if you’re not getting on board, you’ll find your business soon left behind. The time to thoughtfully adopt AI is now. Not sure where to start? Here are the must-know tech terms to get you going.

SOURCES:

Have Consumer Expectations Changed in Debt Collection?

By on July 18th, 2025 in Customer Experience, Industry Insights, Machine Learning
The blog title in front of a person looking at their smart phone.

As recently as 15 years ago, consumer expectations about the debt collection experience looked starkly different than they do today. Back then, people expected debt collection communications to come as a piece of physical mail, and consumers were more likely to answer the phone for an unknown number before spam calls and call labeling and blocking became the norm. Companies who were looking to collect on a debt often used aggressive tactics, and customer satisfaction wasn’t a priority as long as some of the money owed was recovered. 

Now, consumers want empathy, understanding and convenience from the companies they interact with, especially in financial services. These shifts in consumer expectations continue to spark changes in debt collection trends and have led to more businesses investing in digital strategies to better engage with consumers. Join us as we take a more in-depth look at how consumer expectations in debt collection have changed and what it means for your business. 

Customer Satisfaction is a Key Debt Collection Trend 

Consumers today want their problems in financial matters resolved sooner rather than later. A recent survey done by TCN on consumer expectations found that financial companies are seeing a decline in customer satisfaction. One of the main drivers of this trend is people reporting that customer service efforts aren’t solving their problems effectively. A key benchmark used in this survey looked at how often financial service businesses were able to solve customer problems on first contact.

Only 13% of survey respondents said that their problem is always solved the first time they reach out. The more someone is forced to call back or wait for a follow up, the less likely they’ll be to engage with the company moving forward. For debt collection, that means fewer payments the longer a consumer has to wait. These survey findings stem from the debt collection trend of consumers wanting to fix problems on the spot. This notion is part of the reason why self-service portals and mobile apps have become the preferred method of resolving financial matters. 

One key digital debt collection strategy is offering your customers more options that are easily accessible to them. In fact, 59% of consumers in debt want more flexible payment options. If your business is trying to improve its debt collection performance, giving your customers more options will often lead to higher levels of satisfaction. The proof of this digital debt collection trend can be seen with TrueAccord. Roughly 98% of TrueAccord customers resolve their debts with self-serve options and don’t ever interact with a human in the process. 

Preferred Communication Channels for Bill and Debt Notifications Have Changed

Today, there’s no shortage of ways to send customers bills and debt notifications. For many companies out there, these notifications are sent through channels that are convenient and/or familiar to them, which doesn’t always align with consumer preferences. The more in-tune businesses are with consumer preferences, the more likely their communications will be engaged with. For businesses looking to recover debt, that means better collections performance and happier customers. 

Let’s walk through an example. According to the same TCN survey, 47% of consumers prefer to be contacted by email for bill and debt notifications. Around 25% of Gen Z and 22% of Millennial customers prefer to be notified by push notifications through mobile apps. Your digital debt collection strategies need to take these expectations into account to maximize engagement. Even though email was the most desired communication method, every consumer is an individual with their own preferences. 

Some of the best digital debt collection strategies leverage AI and machine learning to test and uncover the best channel for every individual. TrueAccord uses its patented machine learning engine Heartbeat that learns from every customer interaction to determine the best step to take with each consumer. It’s a personalized approach to debt collection where consumer expectations and preferences are at the core of every communication. The result is collecting more from happier people. 

Convenience is King in Digital Debt Collection Strategies

In financial industries like banking and debt collection, convenience has emerged as one of the most important consumer preferences. With how critical messages in these industries often are, consumers want ways to be able to easily address them so the problem doesn’t linger and cause prolonged stress. For further proof of this trend, a recent survey by the American Bankers Association showed that 55% of consumers prefer mobile banking. Only 8% of people surveyed go to a physical branch for their banking needs. 

The consumer trend of wanting more convenience through self-serve options is carried through into the debt collection industry. TrueAccord, for example, has been able to honor this consumer trend with its self-service portal. It’s a low friction way consumers use to pay off debt and should be a key strategy leveraged for digital debt collection. 

Based on research done by McKinsey, consumers who digitally self-serve resolve their debts at higher rates and are much more likely to pay off the debt in full. Plus, the customer satisfaction is much higher with self-service portals compared to making a payment over the phone. These trends emphasize the importance of convenience. But just don’t take it from us, here’s what a real TrueAccord customer had to say: 

“Thank you for being patient and for having a portal that makes it easy to make the payment without filling out a bunch of stuff and having to make an account or something.”

Stay On Top of Consumer Expectations in Debt Collection with TrueAccord

It can be challenging to stay on top of consumer expectations in debt collection. But with the right partner, your business can improve debt collection performance while increasing customer satisfaction. 

TrueAccord is a leading digital debt collection agency that’s powered by machine learning to provide a consumer-friendly experience that honors their preferences. Schedule a consultation today to learn more about how our platform can handle your delinquency needs.